Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28492724›Full record

ReviewClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2017

Human islet xenotransplantation in rodents: A literature review of experimental model trends.

Leandro Ryuchi Iuamoto, André Silva Franco, Fábio Yuji Suguita, Felipe Futema Essu, Lucas Torres Oliveira, Juliana Mika Kato, Matheus Belloni Torsani, Alberto Meyer, Wellington Andraus, Eleazar Chaib and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modular tissue engineering for the vascularization of subcutaneously transplanted pancreatic islets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leandro Ryuchi IuamotoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
André Silva FrancoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Fábio Yuji SuguitaFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Felipe Futema EssuFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Lucas Torres OliveiraFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Juliana Mika KatoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Matheus Belloni TorsaniFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Alberto MeyerDepartamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Wellington AndrausDepartamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Eleazar ChaibDepartamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'AlbuquerqueDepartamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the innovations for the treatment of type 1 diabetes, islet transplantation is a less invasive method of treatment, although it is still in development. One of the greatest barriers to this technique is the low number of pancreas donors and the low number of pancreases that are available for transplantation. Rodent models have been chosen in most studies of islet rejection and type 1 diabetes prevention to evaluate the quality and function of isolated human islets and to identify alternative solutions to the problem of islet scarcity. The purpose of this study is to conduct a review of islet xenotransplantation experiments from humans to rodents, to organize and analyze the parameters of these experiments, to describe trends in experimental modeling and to assess the viability of this procedure. In this study, we reviewed recently published research regarding islet xenotransplantation from humans to rodents, and we summarized the findings and organized the relevant data. The included studies were recent reports that involved xenotransplantation using human islets in a rodent model. We excluded the studies that related to isotransplantation, autotransplantation and allotransplantation. A total of 34 studies that related to xenotransplantation were selected for review based on their relevance and current data. Advances in the use of different graft sites may overcome autoimmunity and rejection after transplantation, which may solve the problem of the scarcity of islet donors in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalGraft SurvivalHumansIslets of Langerhans TransplantationMice, Inbred C57BLRodentiaTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID28492724
PMCPMC5401612
OpenAlexW2613785709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.