Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28492092›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition2018

Use of descriptive and experiential information in decision making by young and older adults.

Thomas M Hess, Erica L O'Brien, Claire M Growney, Julia G Hafer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas M Hessa Department of Psychology , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , USA.
Erica L O'Briena Department of Psychology , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , USA.
Claire M Growneya Department of Psychology , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , USA.
Julia G Hafera Department of Psychology , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , USA.

Funding

SOCIAL COGNITION AND AGINGR01AG005552 · NIA · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI NEUPERT, SHEVAUN D · 1985 to 2019
$5.0M
Social Cognition and AgingR56AG005552 · NIA · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HESS, THOMAS M · 2008 to 2008
$290k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG005552NIA NIH HHS R56 AG005552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age differences involving decision by description versus decision by experience were examined using the same general task structure to facilitate comparisons across decision types. Experiment 1 compared younger (19-43 years) and older (65-85 years) adults in four different experimental conditions involving a choice between a low-risk, low-return bet versus a high-risk, high-return bet. Experiment 2 compared young (18-27 years) to older (60-87 years) adults using similar experimental conditions, but with decisions involving a risky versus a certain option. Contrary to expectations, minimal differences were observed between ages in either study. Higher levels of ability and numeracy were associated with better performance and greater ability to benefit from experience, but the impact of these factors was not moderated by age. The results suggest that factors other than the simple distinction between decisions by description versus experience are necessary to characterize the nature of age effects in decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCognitionFemaleHumansLearningMaleMemoryRisk-TakingYoung AdultAgingcognitiondecision-makinglearningmemory

Identifiers

PMID28492092
PMCPMC6129972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.