Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28492033›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's dermatology2017

Cutaneous melanoma in women.

Mi Ryung Roh, Philip Eliades, Sameer Gupta, Jane M Grant-Kels, Hensin Tsao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's dermatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Life Factors and Melanoma: From the Macroscopic State to the Molecular Mechanism.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathology and Molecular Biology of Melanoma.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  8. Phytochemical Constituents and Derivatives ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Overcoming Immune Evasion in Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. CaAdvances in cancer research · 2020
    Review
  20. "International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mi Ryung RohWellman Center for Photomedicine, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Philip EliadesWellman Center for Photomedicine, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Sameer GuptaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Jane M Grant-KelsDermatology Department, University of CT Health Center, Farmington, CT.
Hensin TsaoWellman Center for Photomedicine, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USUConn Health · US

Funding

Molecular Risk Assessment in Hereditary MelanomaK24CA149202 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TSAO, HENSIN · 2010 to 2019
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA149202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender disparity in melanoma outcome is consistently observed, suggesting that gender is as an important prognostic factor. However, the source of this gender disparity in melanoma remains unclear.

objectiveThis article reviews advances in our understanding of gender differences in melanoma and how such differences may contribute to outcomes.

methodsA broad literature search was conducted using the PubMed database, with search terms such as 'gender differences in melanoma' and 'sex differences in melanoma.' Additional articles were identified from cited references.

resultsHerein, we address the gender-linked physiologic differences in skin and melanoma. We discuss the influence of estrogen on a woman's risk for melanoma and melanoma outcomes with regard to pregnancy, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, and UV tanning.

conclusionsThe published findings on gender disparities in melanoma have yielded many advances in our understanding of this disease. Biological, environmental, and behavioral factors may explain the observed gender difference in melanoma incidence and outcome. Further research will enable us to learn more about melanoma pathogenesis, with the goal of offering better treatments and preventative advice to our patients.

Identifiers

PMID28492033
PMCPMC5419022
OpenAlexW2076082242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.