Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28491949›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's dermatology2015

Autoimmune blistering diseases in females: a review.

Cathy Y Zhao, Dédée F Murrell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's dermatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Burden of pemphigus vulgaris with a particular focus on women: A review.International journal of women's dermatology · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Blistering disorders and their impact on women and their families in theInternational journal of women's dermatology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Psychosocial impact of inherited and autoimmune blistering diseases.International journal of women's dermatology · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cathy Y ZhaoDepartment of Dermatology St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Dédée F MurrellDepartment of Dermatology St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) are a group of heterogeneous skin diseases with autoantibodies directed against structural proteins in the skin. A new interest in the female bias towards autoimmune diseases in general has led to our attention to focus on how and why this female bias manifests in AIBD. The authors aim to review and explore the various aspects of AIBD affecting females more than males, including the higher prevalence, worse quality of life, and complex management issues such as pregnancy and lactation.

Indexed as

Autoimmune blistering diseasesEpidemiologyEpidermolysis bullosa acquisitaFemalePemphigoidPemphigusQuality of lifeToxic epidermal necrolysisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID28491949
PMCPMC5418673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.