ReviewCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2017
Opportunities for Engaging Patients in Kidney Research.
Review in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in African Americans' Attitudes and Behaviors About Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) · 2018Trial
- Building capacity for patient-engagement in neuromuscular disease research: A network project.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Systematic Review of Patient and Caregiver Involvement in CKD Research.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Program Report: Can-SOLVE CKD Network Presents an Inclusive Method for Developing Patient-Oriented Research Tools.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022Article
- Engaging patients and family members to design and implement patient-centered kidney disease research.Research involvement and engagement · 2020Article
- Partnering with patients in healthcare research: a scoping review of ethical issues, challenges, and recommendations for practice.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- How to use and assess qualitative research methods.Neurological research and practice · 2020Review
- Program Report: KidneyPRO, a Web-based Training Module for Patient Engagement in Kidney Research.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020Article
- Found in Translation: Reasons for Optimism in the Pursuit to Prevent Chronic Kidney Disease After Acute Kidney Injury.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2019Review
- Patient and caregiver involvement in a multicentre clustered hemodialysis trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018Article
- Web-Based Tailored Intervention to Support Optimal Medication Adherence Among Kidney Transplant Recipients: Pilot Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2018Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant-Part 1.Frontiers in medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the rationale for engaging patients in research as well as to review the established and envisioned advantages and strategies for patient-researcher partnerships. The authors of this article, which include a patient and 4 researchers in kidney disease, discuss the expected benefits and opportunities for patient engagement in their respective research programs. The 4 research programs span the spectrum of kidney disease and focus on enhancing bone health, increasing living donor kidney transplants, improving medication adherence, and preventing kidney transplant rejection. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The sources of information for this review include published studies on the topics of patient engagement and the 4 research programs of the new investigators. KEY
findings(1) Patient, health care provider, and researcher partnerships can contribute useful insights capable of enhancing research in kidney disease. (2) Regardless of the research program, there are various strategies and opportunities for engagement of patients with lived experience across the various stages of research in kidney disease. (3) Envisioned advantages of patient-researcher partnerships include: targeting patient-identified research priorities, integrating patients' experiential knowledge, improving study design and feasibility through patient-researcher input, facilitating dissemination of research findings to other patients, effectively responding to patient concerns about studies, and inspiring researchers to conduct their research. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of the current review include the relative scarcity of literature on patient engagement within the field of kidney disease. IMPLICATIONS: The findings of the current review suggest that it will be important for future studies to identify optimal strategies for patient engagement in setting research priorities, study design, participant recruitment, execution of research projects, and knowledge dissemination and translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.