Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28491278›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2017

Recent advances in the management of acute ischemic stroke.

Philip Chang, Shyam Prabhakaran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic review of novel technology-based interventions for ischemic stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The cost of ischaemic stroke in Croatia.European stroke journal · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cathepsin L in unstable plaques.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Quantitative high-throughput screening identifies cytoprotective molecules that enhance SUMO conjugation via the inhibition of SUMO-specific protease (SENP)2.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip ChangNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Ward 12-140, Chicago, USA.
Shyam PrabhakaranNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Abbott Hall Suite 1123, 710 N Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, several landmark trials have transformed acute ischemic stroke care. The most dramatic results from the field of acute endovascular intervention demonstrate unequivocal benefit for a select group of patients with moderate to severe deficits presenting within 7 hours from onset and with occlusions of proximal arteries in the anterior circulation. In addition, technological advances and workflow efficiencies have facilitated more rapid delivery of acute stroke interventions. This review provides an overview of recent advances in the management of acute ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

Endovascular TherapyischemiaIschemic StrokeMalignant StrokeMobile Stroke UnitstrokeTeleStroke

Identifiers

PMID28491278
PMCPMC5399955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.