Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28490921›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2017

Use of physician services during the survivorship phase: a multi-province study of women diagnosed with breast cancer.

C Kendell, K M Decker, P A Groome, M L McBride, L Jiang, M K Krzyzanowska, G Porter, D Turner, R Urquhart, M Winget and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

C KendellCancer Outcomes Research Program, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS.
K M DeckerDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
P A GroomeDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
M L McBrideCancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC.
L JiangDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
M K KrzyzanowskaUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON.
G PorterCancer Outcomes Research Program, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS.
D TurnerEpidemiology and Cancer Registry, Cancer-Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
R UrquhartCancer Outcomes Research Program, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS.
M WingetStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, U.S.A.
E GrunfeldDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Canadian Team to Improve Community-Based Cancer Care Along the Continuum
Dalhousie University · CAQueen's University · CAStanford University · USUniversity of Manitoba · CABC Cancer Agency · CACancer Care Ontario · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOncologists have traditionally been responsible for providing routine follow-up care for cancer survivors; in recent years, however, primary care providers (pcps) are taking a greater role in care during the follow-up period. In the present study, we used a longitudinal multi-province retrospective cohort study to examine how primary care and specialist care intersect in the delivery of breast cancer follow-up care.

methodsVarious databases (registry, clinical, and administrative) were linked in each of four provinces: British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Nova Scotia. Population-based cohorts of breast cancer survivors were identified in each province. Physician visits were identified using billings or claims data and were classified as visits to primary care (total, breast cancer-specific, and other), oncology (medical oncology, radiation oncology, and surgery), and other specialties. The mean numbers of visits by physician type and specialty, or by combinations thereof, were examined. The mean numbers of visits for each follow-up year were also examined by physician type.

resultsThe results showed that many women (>64%) in each province received care from both primary care and oncology providers during the follow-up period. The mean number of breast cancer-specific visits to primary care and visits to oncology declined with each follow-up year. Interprovincial variations were observed, with greater surgeon follow-up in Nova Scotia and greater primary care follow-up in British Columbia. Provincial differences could reflect variations in policies and recommendations, relevant initiatives, and resources or infrastructure to support pcp-led follow-up care.

conclusionsOptimizing the role of pcps in breast cancer follow-up care might require strategies to change attitudes about pcp-led follow-up and to better support pcps in providing survivorship care.

Indexed as

Breast cancerfollow-up careprimary caresurvivors

Identifiers

PMID28490921
PMCPMC5407870
OpenAlexW2610496487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.