Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28490920›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2017

The role of family physicians in cancer care: perspectives of primary and specialty care providers.

J Easley, B Miedema, M A O'Brien, J Carroll, D Manca, F Webster, E Grunfeld, Canadian Team to Improve Community-Based Cancer Care Along the Continuum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The implementation of a novel adult cancer survivorship curriculum in a family medicine residency program: a mixed methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Analysis of radiation oncology integration within general practitioners' daily patient care: a cross-sectional survey in Germany.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Barriers and facilitators to integrated cancer care between primary and secondary care: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Exploring Family Physician Training Needs to Improve Cancer Patient Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J EasleyDalhousie University, Family Medicine Teaching Unit, Fredericton, NB.
B MiedemaDalhousie University, Family Medicine Teaching Unit, Fredericton, NB.
M A O'BrienUniversity of Toronto, Department of Family and Community Medicine, and.
J CarrollUniversity of Toronto, Department of Family and Community Medicine, and.
D MancaUniversity of Alberta, Department of Family Medicine, Edmonton, AB.
F WebsterUniversity of Toronto, Department of Family and Community Medicine, and.
E GrunfeldUniversity of Toronto, Department of Family and Community Medicine, and.
Canadian Team to Improve Community-Based Cancer Care Along the Continuum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, the specific role of family physicians (fps) in the care of people with cancer is not well defined. Our goal was to explore physician perspectives and contextual factors related to the coordination of cancer care and the role of fps.

methodsUsing a constructivist grounded theory approach, we conducted telephone interviews with 58 primary and cancer specialist health care providers from across Canada.

resultsThe participants-21 fps, 15 surgeons, 12 medical oncologists, 6 radiation oncologists, and 4 general practitioners in oncology-were asked to describe both the role that fps currently play and the role that, in their opinion, fps should play in the future care of cancer patients across the cancer continuum. Participants identified 3 key roles: coordinating cancer care, managing comorbidities, and providing psychosocial care to patients and their families. However, fps and specialists discussed many challenges that prevent fps from fully performing those roles: ■ The fps described communication problems resulting from not being kept "in the loop" because they weren't copied on patient reports and also the lack of clearly defined roles for all the various health care providers involved in providing care to cancer patients.■ The specialists expressed concerns about a lack of patient access to fp care, leaving specialists to fill the care gaps. The fps and specialists both recommended additional training and education for fps in survivorship care, cancer screening, genetic testing, and new cancer treatments.

conclusionsBetter communication, more collaboration, and further education are needed to enhance the role of fps in the care of cancer patients.

Indexed as

cancer specialistscommunicationFamily physiciansqualitative studies

Identifiers

PMID28490920
PMCPMC5407869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.