Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28490869›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2017

Pulmonary infection control window as a switching point for sequential ventilation in the treatment of COPD patients: a meta-analysis.

Yingying Lv, Qiurong Lv, Quanchao Lv, Tianwen Lai

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03458364 (Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula With Noninvasive Ventilation in Facilitating Weaning Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease From Invasive Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03458364 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula With Noninvasive Ventilation in Facilitating Weaning Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease From Invasive Ventilation: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorJie LiRan2017 to 2018Enrolled42ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) ExacerbationArmsHigh flow nasal cannula, Noninvasive ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Annexin A1 is elevated in patients with COPD and affects lung fibroblast function.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingying LvDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Qiurong LvDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Quanchao LvDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Tianwen LaiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Guangdong Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChoosing the appropriate time to switch to noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) plays a crucial role in promoting successful weaning. However, optimal timing for transitioning and weaning patients from mechanical ventilation (MV) to NPPV has not been clearly established. In China, the pulmonary infection control (PIC) window as a switching point for weaning from MV has been performed for many years, without definitive evidence of clinical benefit. This study aimed to summarize the evidence for NPPV at the PIC window for patients with respiratory failure from COPD.

methodsA comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. The trials were all parallel studies comparing the PIC window weaning strategy versus conventional weaning strategy in treatment of patients with respiratory failure due to COPD.

resultsSixteen studies of 647 participants were eligible. When compared with conventional weaning strategy, early extubation followed by NPPV at the point of PIC window significantly reduced the mortality rate (risk ratios [RRs] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.57) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.41); it also decreased the duration of invasive ventilation (weighted mean difference [WMD] -7.68 days, 95% CI -9.43 to -5.93) and total duration of ventilation (WMD -5.93 days, 95% CI -7.29 to -4.58), which also shortened the lengths of stay in an intensive care unit (WMD -8.51 days, 95% CI -10.23 to -6.79), as well as length of stay in hospital (WMD -8.47 days, 95% CI -8.61 to -7.33).

conclusionThe results showed that the PIC window as a switching point for sequential ventilation in treatment of respiratory failure in COPD patients may be beneficial. It might yield not only relevant information for caregivers in China but also new insights for considering the PIC window by physicians in other countries.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationNoninvasive VentilationPositive-Pressure RespirationAgedFemaleHumansInfection ControlLungMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory InsufficiencyRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsacute exacerbationintensive care unitmechanical ventilationspontaneous breathing trialventilator-associated pneumoniaweaning

Identifiers

PMID28490869
PMCPMC5413483
OpenAlexW2609364278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.