ArticlePopulation and development review2016
The End of Hypergamy: Global Trends and Implications.
Article in Population and development review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Partner preferences for resources adapt to income and gender economic inequality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- The Changing Role of Mothers' Status in Children's College Completion.American sociological review · 2026Article
- Unravelling the threads: understanding the interplay of Cultural values, female workforce engagement, human development index and suicide rates.Archives of women's mental health · 2025Review
- Exploring educational hypogamy among women in urban and rural China: Insights from random forest machine learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Who marries whom and intentions for second child: Using family decision-making power as mediator.PloS one · 2025Article
- Eight Decades of Educational Assortative Mating: A Research Note.Demography · 2024Article
- Gender Equality for Whom? The Changing College Education Gradients of the Division of Paid Work and Housework Among US Couples, 1968-2019.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2024Article
- No End to Hypergamy when Considering the Full Married Population.Population and development review · 2024Article
- Are Female-Breadwinner Couples Always Less Stable? Evidence from French Administrative Data.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2024Article
- MANdatory - why men need (and are needed for) gender equality progress.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- More than Measurement Error: Discrepant Reporting of Contraceptive Use and the Role of Wives' and Husbands' Educational Attainment.Studies in family planning · 2023Article
- Union formation, within-couple dynamics, and child well-being: A global macrolevel perspective.Population, space and place · 2023Article
- Gender, education expansion and intergenerational educational mobility around the world.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- Love is Elsewhere: Internal Migration and Marriage Prospects in China.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2023Article
- Choosing a Major and a Partner: Field of Study and Union Formation Among College-Educated Women in Europe.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2022Article
- Perceived Economic Uncertainty and Fertility Intentions in Couples: A Dyadic Extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour.Journal of family and economic issues · 2022Article
- Relative Economic Position and Female Marriage Migration: Marrying Men in Taiwan across Borders and Boundaries.Population research and policy review · 2022Article
- Gender-Egalitarian Attitudes and Assortative Mating by Age and Education.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2022Article
- Family change and variation through the lens ofPopulation, space and place · 2022Article
- The Road Not Taken: What Developmental Psychology Might Learn From Darwin's Insights Concerning Sexual Selection.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gender gap in education that has long favored men has reversed for young adults in almost all high and middle-income countries. In 2010, the proportion of women aged 25-29 with a college education was higher than that of men in more than 139 countries which altogether represent 86% of the world's population. According to recent population forecasts, women will have more education than men in nearly every country in the world by 2050, with the exception of only a few African and West Asian countries (KC et al. 2010). The reversal of the gender gap in education has major implications for the composition of marriage markets, assortative mating, gender equality, and marital outcomes such as divorce and childbearing (Van Bavel 2012). In this work, we focus on its implications for trends in assortative mating and, in particular, for educational hypergamy: the pattern in which husbands have more education than their wives. This represents a substantial update to previous studies (Esteve et al. 2012) in terms of the number of countries and years included in the analysis. We present findings from an almost comprehensive world-level analysis using census and survey microdata from 420 samples and 120 countries spanning from 1960 to 2011, which allow us to assert that the reversal of the gender gap in education is strongly associated with the end of hypergamy and increases in hypogamy (wives have more education that their husbands). We not only provide near universal evidence of this trend but extend our analysis to consider the implications of the end of hypergamy for family dynamics, outcomes and gender equality. We draw on European microdata to examine whether women are more likely to be the breadwinners when they marry men with lower education than themselves and discuss recent research regarding divorce risks among hypogamous couples. We close our analysis with an examination of attitudes about women earning more money than their husbands and about the implications for children when a woman works for pay.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.