Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28490765›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2017

Effect of genomics-related literacy on non-communicable diseases.

Sho Nakamura, Hiroto Narimatsu, Kayoko Katayama, Ri Sho, Takashi Yoshioka, Akira Fukao, Takamasa Kayama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Knowledge and Attitude of Patients Diagnosed with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer towards Genetic Testing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of West Africans on genetic studies of stroke: Evidence from the SIREN Study.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sho NakamuraDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Hiroto NarimatsuCancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kayoko KatayamaCancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ri ShoDepartment of Public Health, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Takashi YoshiokaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Akira FukaoDepartment of Public Health, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Takamasa KayamaDepartment of Advanced Cancer Science, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent progress in genomic research has raised expectations for the development of personalized preventive medicine, although genomics-related literacy of patients will be essential. Thus, enhancing genomics-related literacy is crucial, particularly for individuals with low genomics-related literacy because they might otherwise miss the opportunity to receive personalized preventive care. This should be especially emphasized when a lack of genomics-related literacy is associated with elevated disease risk, because patients could therefore be deprived of the added benefits of preventive interventions; however, whether such an association exists is unclear. Association between genomics-related literacy, calculated as the genomics literacy score (GLS), and the prevalence of non-communicable diseases was assessed using propensity score matching on 4646 participants (males: 1891; 40.7%). Notably, the low-GLS group (score below median) presented a higher risk of hypertension (relative risk (RR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.16) and obesity (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22) than the high-GLS group. Our results suggest that a low level of genomics-related literacy could represent a risk factor for hypertension and obesity. Evaluating genomics-related literacy could be used to identify a more appropriate population for health and educational interventions.

Indexed as

GenomicsLiteracyAdultAgedFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoncommunicable DiseasesOdds RatioPopulation SurveillanceSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28490765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.