Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28490662›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2017

Occupational exposure to endotoxins and lung cancer risk: results of the ICARE Study.

Soumaya Ben Khedher, Monica Neri, Florence Guida, Mireille Matrat, Sylvie Cenée, Marie Sanchez, Gwenn Menvielle, Florence Molinié, Danièle Luce, Isabelle Stücker and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Soumaya Ben KhedherCentre de recherche en Epidemiologie et Sante des Populations, Universite Paris-Sud, illejuif, France.
Monica NeriCentre de recherche en Epidemiologie et Sante des Populations, Universite Paris-Sud, illejuif, France.
Florence GuidaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, London, UK.
Mireille MatratCentre de recherche en Epidemiologie et Sante des Populations, Universite Paris-Sud, illejuif, France.
Sylvie CenéeCentre de recherche en Epidemiologie et Sante des Populations, Universite Paris-Sud, illejuif, France.
Marie SanchezCentre de recherche en Epidemiologie et Sante des Populations, Universite Paris-Sud, illejuif, France.
Gwenn MenvielleDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Florence MoliniéLoire-Atlantique et Vendée Cancer Registry, Nantes, France.
Danièle LuceFaculté de Médecine, INSERM, Pointe-à-Pitre, France.
Isabelle StückerCentre de recherche en Epidemiologie et Sante des Populations, Universite Paris-Sud, illejuif, France.
ICARE Study Group
Université Paris-Sud · FRIMT Atlantique · FRInserm · FRMRC Centre for Environment and HealthSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the role of occupational exposure to endotoxins in lung cancer in a French population-based case-control study (ICARE (Investigation of occupational and environmental causes of respiratory cancers)).

methodsDetailed information was collected on the occupational history and smoking habits from 2926 patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer and 3555 matched controls. We evaluated each subject's endotoxin exposure after cross referencing International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) codes (for job tasks) and Nomenclature d'Activités Françaises (NAF) codes (for activity sectors). Endotoxin exposure levels were attributed to each work environment based on literature reports. ORs and 95% CIs were estimated using unconditional logistic regression models and controlled for main confounding factors.

resultsAn inverse association between exposure to endotoxins and lung cancer was found (OR=0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.95). Negative trends were shown with duration and cumulative exposure, and the risk was decreased decades after exposure cessation (all statistically significant). Lung cancer risk was particularly reduced among workers highly exposed (eg, in dairy, cattle, poultry, pig farms), but also in those weakly exposed (eg, in waste treatment). Statistically significant interactions were shown with smoking, and never/light smokers were more sensitive to an endotoxin effect than heavy smokers (eg, OR=0.14, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.32 and OR=0.80, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.40, respectively, for the quartiles with the highest cumulative exposure, compared with those never exposed). Pronounced inverse associations were shown with adenocarcinoma histological subtype (OR=0.37, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.55 in the highly exposed).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that exposure to endotoxins, even at a low level, reduces the risk of lung cancer.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsOccupational ExposureOccupationsWorkAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAgedAnimal HusbandryCase-Control StudiesEndotoxinsFemaleFranceHumansLogistic ModelsLungMaleEndotoxinscase-control studiesendotoxinslung canceroccupational exposure

Identifiers

PMID28490662
PMCPMC5574383
OpenAlexW2518633161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.