ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2017
Investigating Clinical Issues by Genotyping of Medically Important Fungi: Why and How?
Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Typing of feces-derived Candida albicans strains using a novel seven-locus microsatellite panel reveals associations with yeast phenotype in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease.Pathogens and disease · 2025Article
- Detection Methods for Pine Wilt Disease: A Comprehensive Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Characteristics of Candida albicans Derived From HIV-Positive Individuals With Oral Candidiasis: Genotyping, Phenotypic Variation, Antifungal Susceptibility, and Biofilm Formation.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Article
- Short Tandem Repeat Genotyping of Medically Important Fungi: A Comprehensive Review of a Powerful Tool with Extensive Future Potential.Mycopathologia · 2024Review
- Uncovering a NovelJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multi-Locus Microsatellite Typing of Colonising and InvasiveJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Genotyping Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Phenotypic and molecular genetics study of Geotrichum candidumLink (1809) and Geotrichum silvicola Pimenta (2005) cultivated on mitis salivarius agar.Molecular biology reports · 2023Article
- Optimization and Validation of Candida auris Short Tandem Repeat Analysis.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Identification of a clonal population of Aspergillus flavus by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Pathogenesis ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2021Review
- Molecular Epidemiology ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A Short-Tandem-Repeat Assay (Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Article
- Genetic Diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Clinical Pathogen Genomics.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2020Review
- Outbreak-Causing Fungi: Pneumocystis jirovecii.Mycopathologia · 2020Review
- Nematode Identification Techniques and Recent Advances.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- A Novel Combination ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- Article
- Outbreak ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genotyping studies of medically important fungi have addressed elucidation of outbreaks, nosocomial transmissions, infection routes, and genotype-phenotype correlations, of which secondary resistance has been most intensively investigated. Two methods have emerged because of their high discriminatory power and reproducibility: multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and microsatellite length polymorphism (MLP) using short tandem repeat (STR) markers. MLST relies on single-nucleotide polymorphisms within the coding regions of housekeeping genes. STR polymorphisms are based on the number of repeats of short DNA fragments, mostly outside coding regions, and thus are expected to be more polymorphic and more rapidly evolving than MLST markers. There is no consensus on a universal typing system. Either one or both of these approaches are now available for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.