Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28490567›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Validity and reliability of the Patient Centred Assessment Method for patient complexity and relationship with hospital length of stay: a prospective cohort study.

Shuhei Yoshida, Masato Matsushima, Hidetaka Wakabayashi, Rieko Mutai, Shinichi Murayama, Tetsuro Hayashi, Hiroko Ichikawa, Yuko Nakano, Takamasa Watanabe, Yasuki Fujinuma

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Definition of patient complexity in adults: A narrative review.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. A scoping Review of tools used to assess patient Complexity in rheumatic disease.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shuhei YoshidaKitaadachi-seikyo Clinic, Japanese Health and Welfare Co-operative Federation, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6747-1857
Masato MatsushimaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidetaka WakabayashiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Rieko MutaiDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinichi MurayamaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuro HayashiDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroko IchikawaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko NakanoDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takamasa WatanabeKitaadachi-seikyo Clinic, Japanese Health and Welfare Co-operative Federation, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuki FujinumaCentre for Family Medicine Development, Japanese Health and Welfare Co-operative Federation, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSeveral instruments for evaluating patient complexity have been developed from a biopsychosocial perspective. Although relationships between the results obtained by these instruments and the length of stay in hospital have been examined, many instruments are complicated and not easy to use. The Patient Centred Assessment Method (PCAM) is a candidate for practical use. This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the PCAM and examine the correlations between length of hospital stay and PCAM scores in a regional secondary care hospital in Japan.

designProspective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingTwo hundred and one patients admitted to Ouji Coop Hospital between July 2014 and September 2014. MAIN PREDICTOR: PCAM total score in initial phase of hospital admission. MAIN OUTCOME: Length of stay in hospital.

resultsAmong 201 patients (Female/Male=98/103) with mean (SD) age of 77.4±11.9 years, the mean PCAM score was 25±7.3 and mean (SD) length of stay in hospital (LOS) 34.1±40.9 days. Using exploratory factor analysis to examine construct validity, PCAM evidently has a two-factor structure, comprising medicine-oriented and patient-oriented complexity. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient for evaluating criterion-based validity between PCAM and INTERMED was 0.90. For reliability, Cronbach's alpha was 0.85. According to negative binomial regression analyses, PCAM scores are a statistically significant predictor (p<0.001) of LOS after adjusting for age, gender, Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form, Charlson Comorbidity Index, serum sodium concentration, total number of medications and whether public assistance was required. In another model, each factor in PCAM was independently correlated with length of stay in hospital after adjustment (medicine-oriented complexity: p=0.001, patient-oriented complexity: p=0.014).

conclusionPCAM is a reliable and valid measurement of patient complexity and PCAM scores have a significant correlation with hospital length of stay.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJapanLength of StayMaleNutrition AssessmentOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient-Centered CareProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSystems Analysisbio psycho social approachcomorbiditygeneral practicelength of stay in hospitalmultimorbiditypatient centred assessment methodpatientcomplexity

Identifiers

PMID28490567
PMCPMC5623372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.