Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28490549›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Possible relationship between general and pregnancy-related anxiety during the first half of pregnancy and the birth process: a prospective cohort study.

Johanna Maria Koelewijn, Anne Marie Sluijs, Tanja G M Vrijkotte

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05386004 (Effects Of Focus On Birth-Specific Stereogram Cards), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05386004 nacompletednot on this map

Effects Of Focus On Birth-Specific Stereogram Cards (BSSC) On Perception Of Labour Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtlas UniversityRan2015 to 2017Enrolled60ConditionsLabor Pain, Birth, FirstArmsBirth-Specific Stereogram Cards (BSSC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. International journal of nursing studies advances · 2022
    Article
  16. Persistent Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Reduces Breastfeeding Exclusiveness and Duration: A Prospective Cohort Study.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Antenatal Classes in the Context of Prenatal Anxiety and Depression during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna Maria KoelewijnSanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Department of Experimental Immunohematology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne Marie SluijsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tanja G M VrijkotteDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe rate of interventions during childbirth has increased dramatically during the last decades. Maternal anxiety might play a role in the progress of the labour process and interventions during labour. This study aimed to identify associations between anxiety in the first half of pregnancy and the birth process, including any interventions required during labour. In addition, differences in the associations by parity and ethnicity were explored.

designProspective cohort study.

settingPrimary care midwifery practices and secondary/tertiary care obstetric practices in Amsterdam, participating in the multiethnic ABCD (Amsterdam Born Children and their Development) study (participation rate 96%; response 8266/12 373 (67%)).

participantsIncluded were women with singletons, alive at labour start, with a gestational age ≥24 weeks (n=6443). INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: General anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state) and pregnancy-related anxiety (Pregnancy-Related Anxieties Questionnaire (PRAQ)) were self-reported in the first half of pregnancy. OUTCOMES: Associations between both forms of anxiety and several indicators of the birth process were analysed. Subgroup analyses were performed for parity and ethnicity.

resultsThe prevalence of high general anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score ≥43) and pregnancy-related anxiety (PRAQ score ≥P90) were 30.9% and 11.0%, respectively. After adjustment, in nulliparae, both general anxiety and pregnancy-related anxiety were associated with pain relief and/or sedation (OR for general anxiety 1.23; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.48; OR for pregnancy-related anxiety 1.45; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.85). In multiparae, general anxiety was associated with induction of labour (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.03) and pregnancy-related anxiety was associated with primary caesarean section (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.70). Associations were largely similar for all ethnicities.

conclusionsHigh levels of general and pregnancy-related anxiety in early pregnancy contribute modestly to more interventions during the birth process with similar associations between ethnic groups, but with some differences between nulliparae and multiparae.

Indexed as

AdultAnxietyCesarean SectionFemaleGestational AgeHumansLabor, ObstetricLogistic ModelsNetherlandsParityParturitionPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAnxietyBirth processEthnicityInterventionsParity

Identifiers

PMID28490549
PMCPMC5623367
OpenAlexW2613493058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.