Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28490418›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Identifying and Understanding the Health Information Experiences and Preferences of Caregivers of Individuals With Either Traumatic Brain Injury, Spinal Cord Injury, or Burn Injury: A Qualitative Investigation.

Nathan T Coffey, James Cassese, Xinsheng Cai, Steven Garfinkel, Drasti Patel, Rebecca Jones, Dahlia Shaewitz, Ali A Weinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Participatory Development of an International Information Brochure on the Multimodal Assessment of Disorders of Consciousness.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Examination of Health Information Needs of Caregivers of and Individuals with Burn Injuries.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathan T CoffeyCenter for the Study of Chronic Illness and Disability, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4346-1213
James CasseseCenter for the Study of Chronic Illness and Disability, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5352-5965
Xinsheng CaiAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6057-3597
Steven GarfinkelAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0393-0954
Drasti PatelCenter for the Study of Chronic Illness and Disability, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8729-5531
Rebecca JonesAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5534-241X
Dahlia ShaewitzAmerican Institutes for Research, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5549-7443
Ali A WeinsteinCenter for the Study of Chronic Illness and Disability, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3371-6086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to meet the challenges of caring for an injured person, caregivers need access to health information. However, caregivers often feel that they lack adequate information. Previous studies of caregivers have primarily focused on either their time and emotional burdens or their health outcomes, but the information needs of caregivers have not been thoroughly investigated.

objectiveThe purpose of this investigation was to identify the preferred sources of health information for caregivers supporting individuals with injuries and to explore how access to this information could be improved.

methodsA total of 32 caregivers participated in semistructured interviews, which were used in order to develop a more in-depth understanding of these caregivers' information needs. Digital audio recordings of the interviews were used for analysis purposes. These audio recordings were analyzed using a thematic analysis or qualitative content analysis. All of participant's interviews were then coded using the qualitative analysis program, Nvivo 10 for Mac (QSR International).

resultsThe caregivers endorsed similar behaviors and preferences when seeking and accessing health information. Medical professionals were the preferred source of information, while ease of access made the Internet the most common avenue to obtain information. The challenges faced by participants were frequently a result of limited support. In describing an ideal health system, participants expressed interest in a comprehensive care website offering support network resources, instructive services about the injury and caregiving, and injury-specific materials.

conclusionsAccording to the participants, an ideal health information system would include a comprehensive care website that offered supportive network resources, instructive services about the injury and caregiving, and materials specific to the type of patient injury.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticBurnsCaregiversEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorMaleMiddle AgedSpinal Cord InjuriesYoung Adultburnscaregivershealth information, consumerqualitative researchspinal cord injuriestraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID28490418
PMCPMC5443912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.