Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28490338›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2017

International evaluation of the psychometrics of health-related quality of life questionnaires for use among long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer.

Marieke van Leeuwen, Jacobien M Kieffer, Fabio Efficace, Sophie D Fosså, Michel Bolla, Laurence Collette, Marc Colombel, Ugo De Giorgi, Bernhard Holzner, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07253987 (Cancer Survivors Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07253987 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Cancer Survivors Program: Effectiveness of Monitoring Adverse Events After Completion of Curative Treatment for Breast and Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorMasaryk Memorial Cancer InstituteRan2025 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsProstate Cancer Patients, Breast Cancer PatientsArmsactive screening of adverse effects of anticancer therapy based on specific questionnaire + quality of life screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Long-term toxicity of cisplatin in germ-cell tumor survivors.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Marieke van LeeuwenDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacobien M KiefferDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fabio EfficaceUnit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA) Data Center, Via Benevento 6, Rome, Italy.
Sophie D FossåOslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo, Norway.
Michel BollaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire A Michallon, BP217, 38043, Grenoble cedex 09, France.
Laurence ColletteStatistics Department, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Marc ColombelDepartment of General Urology and Oncology, Hôpital Édouard Herriot, 5 Place d'Arsonval, Lyon, France.
Ugo De GiorgiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) - IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Bernhard HolznerDepartment of Psychiatry, Innsbruck University Hospital, Sternwartestraße 15, Innsbruck, Austria.
Lonneke V van de Poll-FranseDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hendrik van PoppelDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, K.U. Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeff WhiteThe Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Center, Glasgow, Scotland.
Ronald de WitDepartment of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Dr Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Susanne OsantoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Neil K AaronsonDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.aaronson@nki.nl.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group
Genito-Urinary Cancers Group and Radiation Oncology Group
and the NCRN Testis Clinical Studies Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding of the physical, functional and psychosocial health problems and needs of cancer survivors requires cross-national and cross-cultural standardization of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires that capture the full range of issues relevant to cancer survivors. To our knowledge, only one study has investigated in a comprehensive way whether a questionnaire used to evaluate HRQoL in cancer patients under active treatment is also reliable and valid when used among (long-term) cancer survivors. In this study we evaluated, in an international context, the psychometrics of HRQoL questionnaires for use among long-term, disease-free, survivors of testicular and prostate cancer.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we recruited long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer from Northern and Southern Europe and from the United Kingdom who had participated in two phase III EORTC clinical trials. Participants completed the SF-36 Health Survey, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, the QLQ-PR25 (for prostate cancer) or the QLQ-TC26 (for testicular cancer) questionnaires, and the Impact of Cancer questionnaire. Testicular cancer survivors also completed subscales from the Nordic Questionnaire for Monitoring the Age Diverse Workforce.

resultsTwo hundred forty-two men (66% response rate) were recruited into the study. The average time since treatment was more than 10 years. Overall, there were few missing questionnaire data, although scales related to sexuality, satisfaction with care and relationship concerns of men without partners were missing in more than 10% of cases. Debriefing showed that in general the questionnaires were accepted well. Many of the survivors scored at the upper extremes of the questionnaires, resulting in floor and ceiling effects in 64% of the scales. All of the questionnaires investigated met the threshold of 0.70 for group level reliability, with the exception of the QLQ-TC26 (mean reliability .64) and the QLQ-PR25 (mean reliability .69). The questionnaires were able to discriminate clearly between patients with and without comorbid conditions.

conclusionsThe currently available HRQoL questionnaires exhibit acceptable psychometric properties and were well received by patients, but additional efforts are needed to ensure that the full range of survivor-specific issues is assessed.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurvivorsTesticular NeoplasmsUnited KingdomCancerOncologyProstatic neoplasmsQuestionnairesTesticular neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28490338
PMCPMC5426020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.