SynthesisBMC surgery2017
Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Factors Associated With Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair for Inguinal Hernia
The Effect Of Trans-Anbdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) And Total Extra-Peritoneal (TEP) Procedures on Intraocular Pressure in Laparoscopıc Inguinal Hernia Repair :A Procspective Cohort Study
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of sexual function following Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic mesh repair in primary inguinal hernias, the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Suture versus tacks in minimally invasive transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Chronic inguinal pain post-hernioplasty. Laparo-endoscopic surgery vs lichtenstein repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair for emergency groin hernia: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of endoscopic surgery and Lichtenstein repair for treatment of inguinal hernias: A network meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Current status of single-port versus multi-port approach in laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Robot-assisted abdominal wall surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Standard TAPP with flat mesh versus TAPP with flat mesh plus mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair: a preliminary single-center randomized experience.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Trial
- The effect of peri-operative pain neuroscience education on pain and recovery in adult patients receiving laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Bilateral inguinal transabdominal pre-peritoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty associated to bilateral laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the same intervention: a feasibility study.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023Trial
- Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Trial
- Postoperative outcomes of inguinal hernia repair performed by surgical residents in routine clinical practice: a retrospective single-center analysis.Innovative surgical sciences · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of open partial preperitoneal tension-free repair for inguinal hernia following radical prostatectomy: a single-center retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- The application of internal ring closure in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair for large indirect inguinal hernias: a retrospective study of 162 cases.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Differences in Long-term Quality of Life Assessed by the EuraHS-QoL Scale between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair and Lichtenstein Tension-Free Repair for Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Does Inguinal TAPP Repair Increase the Rate of Midline Supraumbilical Trocar Site Hernia?-A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A retrospective study of defect closure and hernia belt compression for seroma prevention in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Scientific reports · 2026Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) and Lichtenstein operation are established methods for inguinal hernia repair in clinical practice. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies, comparing those two methods for repair of primary inguinal hernia, are still missing. In this study, a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials was performed to compare early and long term outcomes of the two methods.
methodsA literature search was carried out to identify randomized controlled trials, which compared TAPP and Lichtenstein repair for primary inguinal hernia. Outcome measures included duration of operation, length of hospital stay, acute postoperative and chronic pain, time to return to work, hematoma, wound infection, neuralgia, numbness, scrotal swelling, seroma and hernia recurrence. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed, using Odds Ratios (OR) or Standardized Mean Difference (SMD), and Confidence Interval (CI).
resultsEight controlled randomized studies were identified suitable for the analysis. The mean duration of the operation was shorter in Lichtenstein repair (SMD = 6.79 min, 95% CI, -0.68 - 14.25), without significant difference. Comparing both techniques, patients of the laparoscopic group showed postoperatively significantly less chronic inguinal pain (OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.78). Analyses of the remaining outcome measures did not show any significant differences between the two techniques.
conclusionThe results of this analysis indicate that complication rate and outcome of both procedures are comparable. TAPP operation demonstrated only one advantage over Lichtenstein operation with significantly less chronic inguinal pain postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.