Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28489918›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

OCT-angiography: A qualitative and quantitative comparison of 4 OCT-A devices.

Marion R Munk, Helena Giannakaki-Zimmermann, Lieselotte Berger, Wolfgang Huf, Andreas Ebneter, Sebastian Wolf, Martin S Zinkernagel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03590899 (Semi-manual Vessel Density Analysis on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Images of Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 128 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03590899 completednot on this map

Semi-manual Vessel Density Analysis on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Images of Healthy Adults

TypeobservationalSponsorSemmelweis UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled39ConditionsHealthyArmsOptical coherence tomography angiography (Zeiss Cirrus HD OCT 5000 AngioPlex)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Novel semi-automated system for multi-dimensional analysis of macular neovascularization: quantitative biomarkers and rule-based morphological categorization across OCTA platforms.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marion R MunkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6227-2242
Helena Giannakaki-ZimmermannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Lieselotte BergerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Wolfgang HufCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas EbneterDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Sebastian WolfDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Martin S ZinkernagelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the quality of four OCT-angiography(OCT-A) modules.

methodThe retina of nineteen healthy volunteers were scanned with four OCT-devices (Topcon DRI-OCT Triton Swept-source OCT, Optovue RTVue-XR, a prototype Spectralis OCT2, Heidelberg-Engineering and Zeiss Cirrus 5000-HD-OCT). The device-software generated en-face OCT-A images of the superficial (SCP) and deep capillary plexuses (DCP) were evaluated and scored by 3 independent retinal imaging experts. The SCP vessel density was assessed using Angiotool-software. After the inter-grader reliability assessment, a consensus grading was performed and the modules were ranked based on their scoring.

resultsThere was no significant difference in the vessel density among the modules (Zeiss 48.7±4%, Optovue 47.9±3%, Topcon 48.3±2%, Heidelberg 46.5±4%, p = 0.2). The numbers of discernible vessel-bifurcations differed significantly on each module (Zeiss 2±0.9 bifurcations, Optovue 2.5±1.2, Topcon 1.3±0.7 and Heidelberg 0.5±0.6, p≤0.001). The ranking of each module differed depending on the evaluated parameter. In the overall ranking, the Zeiss module was superior and in 90% better than the median (Bonferroni corrected p-value = 0.04). Optovue was better than the median in 60%, Topcon in 40% and Heidelberg module in 10%, however these differences were not statistically significant.

conclusionEach of the four evaluated OCT-A modules had particular strengths, which differentiated it from their competitors.

Indexed as

AdultAngiographyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRetinaRetinal Vessels

Identifiers

PMID28489918
PMCPMC5425250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.