Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28489913›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Human perception of electrical stimulation on the surface of somatosensory cortex.

Shivayogi V Hiremath, Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara, Jesse J Wheeler, Daniel W Moran, Robert A Gaunt, Jennifer L Collinger, Stephen T Foldes, Douglas J Weber, Weidong Chen, Michael L Boninger and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Clinical Applications and Future Translation of Somatosensory Neuroprostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  5. Neurosurgery and the Brain-Computer Interface.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Injecting Information into the Mammalian Cortex: Progress, Challenges, and Promise.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  19. Extensive Cortical Convergence to Primate Reticulospinal Pathways.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shivayogi V HiremathDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Elizabeth C Tyler-KabaraDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jesse J WheelerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Daniel W MoranDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Robert A GauntDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jennifer L CollingerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Stephen T FoldesDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Douglas J WeberDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Weidong ChenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Michael L BoningerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Wei WangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-659X
University of Pittsburgh · USWashington University in St. Louis · USBarnes-Jewish Hospital · USBarrow Neurological Institute · US

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2TR000146 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$8.7M
Cortical Control of a Dextrous Prosthetic HandR01NS050256 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SCHWARTZ, ANDREW B. · 2006 to 2012
$6.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000146NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancement in electrocorticography (ECoG)-based brain-computer interface technology has sparked a new interest in providing somatosensory feedback using ECoG electrodes, i.e., cortical surface electrodes. We conducted a 28-day study of cortical surface stimulation in an individual with arm paralysis due to brachial plexus injury to examine the sensation produced by electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex. A high-density ECoG grid was implanted over the somatosensory and motor cortices. Stimulation through cortical surface electrodes over the somatosensory cortex successfully elicited arm and hand sensations in our participant with chronic paralysis. There were three key findings. First, the intensity of perceived sensation increased monotonically with both pulse amplitude and pulse frequency. Second, changing pulse width changed the type of sensation based on qualitative description provided by the human participant. Third, the participant could distinguish between stimulation applied to two neighboring cortical surface electrodes, 4.5 mm center-to-center distance, for three out of seven electrode pairs tested. Taken together, we found that it was possible to modulate sensation intensity, sensation type, and evoke sensations across a range of locations from the fingers to the upper arm using different stimulation electrodes even in an individual with chronic impairment of somatosensory function. These three features are essential to provide effective somatosensory feedback for neuroprosthetic applications.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationBrain-Computer InterfacesBrain MappingElectrodesElectrodes, ImplantedHumansSomatosensory Cortex

Identifiers

PMID28489913
PMCPMC5425101
OpenAlexW2612430951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.