Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28489793›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2017

A selective screening program for the early detection of mucopolysaccharidosis: Results of the FIND project - a 2-year follow-up study.

Cristóbal Colón, J Victor Alvarez, Cristina Castaño, Luís G Gutierrez-Solana, Ana M Marquez, María O'Callaghan, Félix Sánchez-Valverde, Carmen Yeste, María-Luz Couce

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Cristóbal ColónUnit of Diagnosis and Treatment of Congenital Metabolic Diseases, Service of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, CIBERER, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela Service of Pediatrics, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor Section of Pediatric Neurology, Service of Pediatrics, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, CIBERER, Madrid Unit of Diagnosis and Treatment of Congenital Metabolic Diseases, Service of Pediatrics Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Materno Infantil de Badajoz Department of Neuropaediatrics, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues, Barcelona Gastroenterology and Paediatric Nutrition Unit, Hospital Virgen del Camino, Pamplona Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Costa del Sol de Marbella, Spain.
J Victor Alvarez
Cristina Castaño
Luís G Gutierrez-Solana
Ana M Marquez
María O'Callaghan
Félix Sánchez-Valverde
Carmen Yeste
María-Luz Couce
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago · ESHospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús · ESHospital Materno-Infantil · ESHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ESHospital Virgen del Camino · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) are underdiagnosed but they are evaluated in few newborn screening programs, probably due to the many challenges remaining, such as the identification of late-onset phenotypes. Systematic screening at the onset of clinical symptoms could help to early identify patients who may benefit from specific treatments. The aim of this prospective study was to assess a novel selective screening program, the FIND project, targeting patients aged 0 to 16 years with clinical manifestations of MPS. The project was designed to increase awareness of these diseases among pediatricians and allow early diagnosis.From July 2014 to June 2016, glycosaminoglycan (GAG) levels normalized to creatinine levels were determined in urine-impregnated analytical paper submitted by pediatricians who had patients with clinical signs and/or symptoms compatible with MPS. When high GAG concentrations were detected, a new liquid urine sample was requested to confirm and identify the GAG present. When a specific form of MPS was suspected, enzyme activity was analyzed using blood-impregnated paper to determine MPS type (I, IIIB, IIIC, IVA, IVB, VI, or VII). Age-specific reference values for GAG were previously established using 145 urine samples from healthy children.GAG levels were normal in 147 (81.7%) of the 180 initial samples received. A liquid sample was requested for the other 33 cases (18.3%); GAG levels were normal in 13 of these and slightly elevated in 12, although the electrophoresis study showed no evidence of MPS. Elevated levels with corresponding low enzymatic activity were confirmed in 8 cases. The mean time from onset of clinical symptoms to detection of MPS was 22 months, and just 2 cases were detected at the beginning of the project were detected with 35 and 71 months of evolution of clinical symptoms. Our screening strategy for MPS had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 85%, and a positive predictive value of 24%.The FIND project is a useful and cost-effective screening method for increasing awareness of MPS among pediatricians and enabling the detection of MPS at onset of clinical symptoms.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAdolescentBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolEarly DiagnosisFemaleFluorometryFollow-Up StudiesGlycosaminoglycansHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMucopolysaccharidosesBiomarkersGlycosaminoglycans

Identifiers

PMID28489793
PMCPMC5428627
OpenAlexW2913338401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.