Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28489648›Full record

SynthesisCritical care medicine2017

Clinical Experience With IV Angiotensin II Administration: A Systematic Review of Safety.

Laurence W Busse, Xueyuan Shelly Wang, Divya M Chalikonda, Kevin W Finkel, Ashish K Khanna, Harold M Szerlip, David Yoo, Sharon L Dana, Lakhmir S Chawla

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04901169 (Angiotensin II in Liver Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04901169 phase2 / phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Angiotensin II in Liver Transplantation (AngLT-1): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2022 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsLiver Transplant, Complications, VasoplegiaArmsAngiotensin II, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Vasoactive Agents in Burn Patients: Perspectives on Angiotensin-II.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Angiotensin II-Real-Life Use and Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Angiotensin II.Intensive care medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Use of Spironolactone in SARS-CoV-2 ARDS Patients.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Angiotensin II.Hospital pharmacy · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Angiotensin in Critical Care.Critical care (London, England) · 2018
    Review
  18. Angiotensin II: a new therapeutic option for vasodilatory shock.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laurence W Busse1Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory St. Joseph's Hospital, Atlanta, GA.2Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesia, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.3Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.4Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.5Anesthesiology Institute, Center for Critical Care and Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.6Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX.7Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.8La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company, San Diego, CA.9Division of Intensive Care Medicine and Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Xueyuan Shelly Wang
Divya M Chalikonda
Kevin W Finkel
Ashish K Khanna
Harold M Szerlip
David Yoo
Sharon L Dana
Lakhmir S Chawla
La Jolla Pharmaceutical (United States) · USBaylor University Medical Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Maryland Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAngiotensin II is an endogenous hormone with vasopressor and endocrine activities. This is a systematic review of the safety of IV angiotensin II. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane. STUDY SELECTION: Studies in which human subjects received IV angiotensin II were selected whether or not safety was discussed. DATA EXTRACTION: In total, 18,468 studies were screened by two reviewers and one arbiter. One thousand one hundred twenty-four studies, in which 31,281 participants received angiotensin II (0.5-3,780 ng/kg/min), were selected. Data recorded included number of subjects, comorbidities, angiotensin II dose and duration, pressor effects, other physiologic and side effects, and adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: The most common nonpressor effects included changes in plasma aldosterone, renal function, cardiac variables, and electrolytes. Adverse events were infrequent and included headache, chest pressure, and orthostatic symptoms. The most serious side effects were exacerbation of left ventricular failure in patients with congestive heart failure and bronchoconstriction. One patient with congestive heart failure died from refractory left ventricular failure. Refractory hypotensive shock was fatal in 55 of 115 patients treated with angiotensin II in case studies, cohort studies, and one placebo-controlled study. One healthy subject died after a pressor dose of angiotensin II was infused continuously for 6 days. No other serious adverse events attributable to angiotensin II were reported. Heterogeneity in study design prevented meta-analysis.

conclusionAdverse events associated with angiotensin II were infrequent; however, exacerbation of asthma and congestive heart failure and one fatal cerebral hemorrhage were reported. This systematic review supports the notion that angiotensin II has an acceptable safety profile for use in humans.

Indexed as

Angiotensin IIHumansInjections, IntravenousAngiotensin II

Identifiers

PMID28489648
PMCPMC5515638
OpenAlexW2614056232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.