SynthesisCritical care medicine2017
Clinical Experience With IV Angiotensin II Administration: A Systematic Review of Safety.
Synthesis in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04901169 (Angiotensin II in Liver Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Angiotensin II in Liver Transplantation (AngLT-1): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Pilot, Single-Blinded, Randomized Crossover Trial of Cramp Reduction with Angiotensin II in Maintenance Patients on Hemodialysis (the CRAMP-HD Study).American journal of nephrology · 2025Trial
- Role of Angiotensin II as a Vasoactive Agent to Treat Distributive Shock With a Focus on Preliminary Data in Pediatric-Aged Patients.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Review
- Vasoactive Agents in Burn Patients: Perspectives on Angiotensin-II.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025Review
- Supplementation with Standardized Green/Black or White Tea Extracts Attenuates Hypertension and Ischemia-Reperfusion-Induced Myocardial Damage in Mice Infused with Angiotensin II.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Angiotensin II-Real-Life Use and Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Angiotensin ii therapy in refractory septic shock: which patient can benefit most? A narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024Review
- Target flow deviations on the cardiopulmonary bypass cause postoperative delirium in cardiothoracic surgery-a retrospective study evaluating temporal fluctuations of perfusion data.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Angiotensin II.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Alternatives to norepinephrine in septic shock: Which agents and when?Journal of intensive medicine · 2022Review
- A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study of Angiotensin II in Shock.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2022Observational
- Vasopressors and Risk of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: A Worldwide Pharmacovigilance Analysis and Comprehensive Literature Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Use of Spironolactone in SARS-CoV-2 ARDS Patients.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2020Article
- Synthetic Human Angiotensin II in Pediatric Patients With Vasodilatory Shock: A Report on Two Patients.Critical care explorations · 2019Article
- Angiotensin II.Hospital pharmacy · 2018Article
- Angiotensin II for the treatment of vasodilatory shock: enough data to consider angiotensin II safe?Critical care (London, England) · 2018Article
- Angiotensin in Critical Care.Critical care (London, England) · 2018Review
- Angiotensin II: a new therapeutic option for vasodilatory shock.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018Review
- The effect of angiotensin II on blood pressure in patients with circulatory shock: a structured review of the literature.Critical care (London, England) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAngiotensin II is an endogenous hormone with vasopressor and endocrine activities. This is a systematic review of the safety of IV angiotensin II. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane. STUDY SELECTION: Studies in which human subjects received IV angiotensin II were selected whether or not safety was discussed. DATA EXTRACTION: In total, 18,468 studies were screened by two reviewers and one arbiter. One thousand one hundred twenty-four studies, in which 31,281 participants received angiotensin II (0.5-3,780 ng/kg/min), were selected. Data recorded included number of subjects, comorbidities, angiotensin II dose and duration, pressor effects, other physiologic and side effects, and adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: The most common nonpressor effects included changes in plasma aldosterone, renal function, cardiac variables, and electrolytes. Adverse events were infrequent and included headache, chest pressure, and orthostatic symptoms. The most serious side effects were exacerbation of left ventricular failure in patients with congestive heart failure and bronchoconstriction. One patient with congestive heart failure died from refractory left ventricular failure. Refractory hypotensive shock was fatal in 55 of 115 patients treated with angiotensin II in case studies, cohort studies, and one placebo-controlled study. One healthy subject died after a pressor dose of angiotensin II was infused continuously for 6 days. No other serious adverse events attributable to angiotensin II were reported. Heterogeneity in study design prevented meta-analysis.
conclusionAdverse events associated with angiotensin II were infrequent; however, exacerbation of asthma and congestive heart failure and one fatal cerebral hemorrhage were reported. This systematic review supports the notion that angiotensin II has an acceptable safety profile for use in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.