Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28489277›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2017

Pancreas-After-Islet Transplantation in Nonuremic Type 1 Diabetes: A Strategy for Restoring Durable Insulin Independence.

S A Wisel, J M Gardner, G R Roll, J Harbell, C E Freise, S Feng, S M Kang, R Hirose, D B Kaufman, A M Posselt and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S A WiselDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
J M GardnerDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
G R RollDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
J HarbellDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
C E FreiseDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
S FengDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
S M KangDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
R HiroseDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
D B KaufmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
A M PosseltDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
P G StockDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Filling a Void of Research (FAVOR) Training for Transplant SurgeonsT32AI125222 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PETER G STOCK, Minnie M Sarwal · 2016 to 2026
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI125222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Islet transplantation offers a minimally invasive approach for β cell replacement in diabetic patients with hypoglycemic unawareness. Attempts at insulin independence may require multiple islet reinfusions from distinct donors, increasing the risk of allogeneic sensitization. Currently, solid organ pancreas transplant is the only remaining surgical option following failed islet transplantation in the United States; however, the immunologic impact of repeated exposure to donor antigens on subsequent pancreas transplantation is unclear. We describe a case series of seven patients undergoing solid organ pancreas transplant following islet graft failure with long-term follow-up of pancreatic graft survival and renal function. Despite highly variable panel reactive antibody levels prior to pancreas transplant (mean 27 ± 35%), all seven patients achieved stable and durable insulin independence with a mean follow-up of 6.7 years. Mean hemoglobin A1c values improved significantly from postislet, prepancreas levels (mean 8.1 ± 1.5%) to postpancreas levels (mean 5.3 ± 0.1%; p = 0.0022). Three patients experienced acute rejection episodes that were successfully managed with thymoglobulin and methylprednisolone, and none of these preuremic type 1 diabetic recipients developed stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease postoperatively. These results support pancreas-after-islet transplantation with aggressive immunosuppression and protocol biopsies as a viable strategy to restore insulin independence after islet graft failure.

Indexed as

Islets of Langerhans TransplantationPancreas TransplantationAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInsulinMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk FactorsYoung AdultImmunosuppressive AgentsInsulinclinical research/practicediabetes: type 1immunosuppressive regimensislet transplantationpancreas/simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantationpatient characteristicsprotocol biopsy

Identifiers

PMID28489277
PMCPMC5573612
OpenAlexW2613884460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.