Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28488991›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2017

Geriatric Hip Fracture Care: Fixing a Fragmented System.

Mary E Anderson, Kelly Mcdevitt, Ethan Cumbler, Heather Bennett, Zachary Robison, Bryan Gomez, Jason W Stoneback

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implementation of a geriatric care bundle for older adults with acute burns.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Merits of Surgical Comanagement of Patients With Hip Fracture by Dedicated Orthopaedic Hospitalists.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary E AndersonAssistant Professor in the Hospital Medicine Section of the Division of General Internal Medicine at the University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine. mary.anderson@ucdenver.edu.
Kelly McdevittClinical Nurse Manager in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Hospital in Aurora. kelly.mcdevitt@uchealth.org.
Ethan CumblerProfessor in the Hospital Medicine Section of the Division of General Internal Medicine at the University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine. ethan.cumbler@ucdenver.edu.
Heather BennettData Analyst for the Institute of Healthcare Quality, Safety, and Efficiency at the University of Colorado Hospital in Aurora. heather.bennett@uchealth.org.
Zachary RobisonProcess Improvement Consultant for the Institute of Healthcare Quality, Safety, and Efficiency at the University of Colorado Hospital in Aurora. zach.robison@gmail.com.
Bryan GomezProcess Improvement Consultant for the Institute of Healthcare Quality, Safety, and Efficiency at the University of Colorado Hospital in Aurora. bryan.w.gomez@gmail.com.
Jason W StonebackAssistant Professor in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at the University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine. jason.stoneback@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFragmentation in geriatric hip fracture care is a growing concern because of the aging population. Patients with hip fractures at our institution historically were admitted to multiple different services and units, leading to unnecessary variation in inpatient care. Such inconsistency contributed to delays in surgery, discharge, and functional recovery; hospital-acquired complications; failure to adhere to best practices in osteoporosis management; and poor coordination with outpatient practitioners.

objectiveTo describe a stepwise approach to systems redesign for this patient population.

designWe designed and implemented a comprehensive geriatric hip fracture program for patients aged 65 years and older at our academic Medical Center in October 2014. Key interventions included admission of all ward-status patients to the Orthopedics Service with hospitalist comanagement; geographic placement on the Orthopedics Unit; and standardized, evidence-based electronic order sets bundling geriatric best practices and a streamlined workflow for discharge planning.

main outcome measuresHospital length of stay.

resultsWe identified 271 admissions among 267 patients between January 1, 2012, and March 31, 2016; of those, 154 were before and 117 were after program implementation. Mean hospital length of stay significantly improved from 6.4 to 5.5 days (p = 0.004). The 30-day all-cause readmission rate and discharge disposition remained stable. The percentage of patients receiving osteoporosis evaluation and treatment increased significantly. The rate of completed 30-day outpatient follow-up also improved.

conclusionOur comprehensive geriatric hip fracture program achieved and sustained gains in the quality and efficiency of care by improving fragmentation in the health care system.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentPatient Care TeamProgram EvaluationAgedAged, 80 and overColoradoFemaleHip FracturesHumansLength of StayMale

Identifiers

PMID28488991
PMCPMC5424597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.