Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28488873›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2017

Removal of Differential Capacitive Interferences in Fast-Scan Cyclic Voltammetry.

Justin A Johnson, Caddy N Hobbs, R Mark Wightman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Waveform Optimization for theACS measurement science au · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of electrochemical methods for tonic dopamine detectionTrends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin A JohnsonDepartment of Chemistry and ‡Neuroscience Center and Neurobiology Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3290, United States.
Caddy N HobbsDepartment of Chemistry and ‡Neuroscience Center and Neurobiology Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3290, United States.
R Mark WightmanDepartment of Chemistry and ‡Neuroscience Center and Neurobiology Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3290, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2198-139X

Funding

DYNAMICS OF IN VIVO DOPAMINE RELEASER01DA010900 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WIGHTMAN, ROBERT MARK · 1997 to 2017
$5.1M
Electrochemical tools to measure local cerebral blood flow and metabolismR01DA032530 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WIGHTMAN, ROBERT MARK · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA010900NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to its high spatiotemporal resolution, fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) at carbon-fiber microelectrodes enables the localized in vivo monitoring of subsecond fluctuations in electroactive neurotransmitter concentrations. In practice, resolution of the analytical signal relies on digital background subtraction for removal of the large current due to charging of the electrical double layer as well as surface faradaic reactions. However, fluctuations in this background current often occur with changes in the electrode state or ionic environment, leading to nonspecific contributions to the FSCV data that confound data analysis. Here, we both explore the origin of such shifts seen with local changes in cations and develop a model to account for their shape. Further, we describe a convolution-based method for removal of the differential capacitive contributions to the FSCV current. The method relies on the use of a small-amplitude pulse made prior to the FSCV sweep that probes the impedance of the system. To predict the nonfaradaic current response to the voltammetric sweep, the step current response is differentiated to provide an estimate of the system's impulse response function and is used to convolute the applied waveform. The generated prediction is then subtracted from the observed current to the voltammetric sweep, removing artifacts associated with electrode impedance changes. The technique is demonstrated to remove select contributions from capacitive characteristics changes of the electrode both in vitro (i.e., in flow-injection analysis) and in vivo (i.e., during a spreading depression event in an anesthetized rat).

Indexed as

Electrochemical TechniquesAnimalsCarbon FiberMaleMicroelectrodesNeurotransmitter AgentsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySoftwareCarbon FiberNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID28488873
PMCPMC5685151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.