Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28488688›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2017

Association between coffee or tea drinking and Barrett's esophagus or esophagitis: an Italian study.

R A Filiberti, V Fontana, A De Ceglie, S Blanchi, E Grossi, D Della Casa, T Lacchin, M De Matthaeis, O Ignomirelli, R Cappiello and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Prognostic factors affecting long-term outcomes in patients with brain metastasis from esophageal carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

R A FilibertiClinical Epidemiology, IRCCS AOU San Martino- IST-Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova, Italy.
V FontanaClinical Epidemiology, IRCCS AOU San Martino- IST-Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova, Italy.
A De CeglieGastroenterology, General Hospital, Sanremo, Imperia, Italy.
S BlanchiGastroenterology, General Hospital, Sanremo, Imperia, Italy.
E GrossiMedical Department, Bracco Spa, Milan, Italy.
D Della CasaDigestive Endoscopic Surgery, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
T LacchinEndoscopy, Policlinico San Giorgio, Pordenone, Italy.
M De MatthaeisGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Ospedale di Lavagna, Lavagna, Italy.
O IgnomirelliEndoscopy, IRCCS, Rionero in Vulture, Potenza, Italy.
R CappielloGastroenterology, S. Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy.
A RosaClinical Epidemiology, IRCCS AOU San Martino- IST-Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova, Italy.
M FotiGastroenterology, LARC private Clinic, Torino, Italy.
F LaterzaInternal Medicine and Gastroenterology, University &Foundation, Chieti, Italy.
V D'OnofrioGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, S. G. Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy.
G IaquintoGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, S. G. Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy.
M ConioGastroenterology, General Hospital, Sanremo, Imperia, Italy.
Ospedale di Sanremo · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Degli Angeli · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITBracco (Italy) · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesOnly a few papers have treated of the relationship between Barrett's esophagus (BE) or erosive esophagitis (E) and coffee or tea intake. We evaluated the role of these beverages in BE and E occurrence. SUBJECTS/

methodsPatients with BE (339), E (462) and controls (619) were recruited. Data on coffee and tea and other individual characteristics were collected using a structured questionnaire.

resultsBE risk was higher in former coffee drinkers, irrespective of levels of exposure (cup per day; ⩽1: OR=3.76, 95% CI 1.33-10.6; >1: OR=3.79, 95% CI 1.31-11.0; test for linear trend (TLT) P=0.006) and was higher with duration (>30 years: OR=4.18, 95% CI 1.43-12.3; TLT P=0.004) and for late quitters, respectively (⩽3 years from cessation: OR=5.95, 95% CI 2.19-16.2; TLT P<0.001). The risk of BE was also higher in subjects who started drinking coffee later (age >18 years: OR=6.10, 95% CI 2.15-17.3). No association was found in current drinkers, but for an increased risk of E in light drinkers (<1 cup per day OR =1.85, 95% CI 1.00-3.43).A discernible risk reduction of E (about 20%, not significant) and BE (about 30%, P<0.05) was observed in tea drinkers.

conclusionsOur data were suggestive of a reduced risk of BE and E with tea intake. An adverse effect of coffee was found among BE patients who had stopped drinking coffee. Coffee or tea intakes could be indicative of other lifestyle habits with protective or adverse impact on esophageal mucosa.

Indexed as

CoffeeFunctional FoodTeaAdultAgedBarrett EsophagusCase-Control StudiesEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEsophageal MucosaEsophagitisFemaleHumansIncidenceItalyMaleMiddle AgedCoffeeTeaTeas, Herbal

Identifiers

PMID28488688
OpenAlexW2612541346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.