Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28488584›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

Clinicopathologic significance and prognostic value of Ki-67 expression in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Guanying Luo, Yunzhao Hu, Zhiqiao Zhang, Peng Wang, Zhaowen Luo, Jinxin Lin, Canchang Cheng, You Yang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent advancement of HDAC inhibitors against breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guanying LuoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Shunde, Guangdong, China.
Yunzhao HuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Shunde, Guangdong, China.
Zhiqiao ZhangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Shunde, Guangdong, China.
Peng WangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Shunde, Guangdong, China.
Zhaowen LuoDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Chencun Affiliated Hospital of First People's Hospital of Shunde, Shunde, Guangdong, China.
Jinxin LinDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Chencun Affiliated Hospital of First People's Hospital of Shunde, Shunde, Guangdong, China.
Canchang ChengDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Shunde, Guangdong, China.
You YangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Shunde, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic value and clinicopathologic significance of Ki-67 expression in gastric cancer patients was controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to clarify the prognostic value and clinicopathologic significance of Ki-67 expression in gastric cancer patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeveral electronic databases were searched for eligible studies. The pooled odds ratio (OR), hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval(CI) were calculated to explore the prognostic value and clinicopathologic significance of Ki-67 expression for disease free survival and overall survival.

resultsTotally 5600 gastric cancer patients from 29 studies were included in this study. High Ki-67 expression was significantly related with Lauren's classification (OR = 1.70; P = 0.001; 95%CI: 1.40-2.06) and tumor size(OR = 1.54; P = 0.006; 95%CI: 1.14-2.09). However, high Ki-67 expression was not significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.37; P = 0.138; 95% CI: 0.90-2.08) , tumor stage (OR = 1.31; P = 0.296; 95% CI: 0.79-2.16) and tumor differentiation (OR = 1.03; P = 0.839; 95% CI: 0.78-1.35). The pooled HRs were 1.87(P = 0.001; 95% CI 1.30-2.69) for disease free survival and 1.23(P = 0.005; 95% CI 1.06-1.42) for overall survival.

conclusionsHigh Ki-67 expression may serve as a predictive biomarker for poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients. Stratification by Ki-67 expression may be a consideration for selection of therapeutic regimen and integrated managements.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenMalePrognosisStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 Antigengastric cancerki-67meta-analysisprognostic value

Identifiers

PMID28488584
PMCPMC5564848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.