Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28488327›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer care2017

A "time out consultation" in primary care for elderly patients with cancer: Better treatment decisions by structural involvement of the general practitioner.

N J de Wit

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prioritisation of treatment goals among older patients with non-curable cancer: the OPTion randomised controlled trial in Dutch primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Trial
  2. Through the Eyes of Patients: The Effect of Training General Practitioners and Nurses on Perceived Shared Decision-Making Support.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prostate cancer treatment choices: the GP's role in shared decision making.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Increased survival means increasing roles for primary care after cancer diagnosis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

N J de WitJuliuus Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-8290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment decisions in elderly patients with cancer are complex. Not only the type and stage of the tumor, but also comorbidity, medical background and personal contextual factors need to be taken into account. The individual treatment perspective, life expectancy and quality of life are important determinants of the final treatment decision for the elderly cancer patient. Because of their longstanding relation with the elderly and their holistic approach we think that general practitioners should be involved, and we suggest that every elderly patient with cancer should have a 'time out consultation' with the general practitioner to prepare for the final treatment choice.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingAgedGeneral PracticeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLife ExpectancyNeoplasmsPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareQuality of Lifeelderly cancer patientpatient informationshared decision makingtreatment decisions

Identifiers

PMID28488327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.