Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28488248›Full record

ArticleClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2017

Response to Treatment with TNFα Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Associated with High Levels of GM-CSF and GM-CSF

Jonas Bystrom, Felix I Clanchy, Taher E Taher, Mohammed M Al-Bogami, Hawzheen A Muhammad, Saba Alzabin, Pamela Mangat, Ali S Jawad, Richard O Williams, Rizgar A Mageed

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. GM-CSFTheranostics · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Plasma interleukin-23 and circulating IL-17AArthritis research & therapy · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Autoimmunity in 2017.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas BystromCentre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Felix I ClanchyKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Taher E TaherCentre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Mohammed M Al-BogamiCentre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Hawzheen A MuhammadCentre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Saba AlzabinKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Pamela MangatDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Fundation Trust London, London, UK.
Ali S JawadCentre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Richard O WilliamsKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Rizgar A MageedCentre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK. r.a.mageed@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1561-784X
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802513Pfizer UK WS872934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologic TNFα inhibitors are a mainstay treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to other treatment options. However, many patients either do not respond or relapse after initially responding to these agents. This study was carried out to identify biomarkers that can distinguish responder from non-responder patients before the initiation of treatment. The level of cytokines in plasma and those produced by ex vivo T cells, B cells and monocytes in 97 RA patients treated with biologic TNFα inhibitors was measured before treatment and after 1 and 3 months of treatment by multiplex analyses. The frequency of T cell subsets and intracellular cytokines were determined by flow cytometry. The results reveal that pre-treatment, T cells from patients who went on to respond to treatment with biologic anti-TNFα agents produced significantly more GM-CSF than non-responder patients. Furthermore, immune cells from responder patients produced higher levels of IL-1β, TNFα and IL-6. Cytokine profiling in the blood of patients confirmed the association between high levels of GM-CSF and responsiveness to biologic anti-TNFα agents. Thus, high blood levels of GM-CSF pre-treatment had a positive predictive value of 87.5% (61.6 to 98.5% at 95% CI) in treated RA patients. The study also shows that cells from most anti-TNFα responder patients in the current cohort produced higher levels of GM-CSF and TNFα pre-treatment than non-responder patients. Findings from the current study and our previous observations that non-responsiveness to anti-TNFα is associated with high IL-17 levels suggest that the disease in responder and non-responder RA patients is likely to be driven/sustained by different inflammatory pathways. The use of biomarker signatures of distinct pro-inflammatory pathways could lead to evidence-based prescription of the most appropriate biological therapies for different RA patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiomarkers, PharmacologicalB-LymphocytesCells, CulturedFemaleGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansInflammation MediatorsInterleukin-17Lymphocyte ActivationMaleMiddle AgedT-LymphocytesAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkers, PharmacologicalGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorInflammation MediatorsInterleukin-17Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaGM-CSFRheumatoid arthritisT lymphocytesTNFα

Identifiers

PMID28488248
PMCPMC5597702
OpenAlexW2613469721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.