Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28488234›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2017

Microphysiological Human Brain and Neural Systems-on-a-Chip: Potential Alternatives to Small Animal Models and Emerging Platforms for Drug Discovery and Personalized Medicine.

Alexander P Haring, Harald Sontheimer, Blake N Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Advances in Engineering Human Tissue Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Microphysiological systems to advance human pathophysiology and translational medicine.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander P HaringDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Harald SontheimerGlial Biology in Health, Disease, and Cancer Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA.
Blake N JohnsonDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. bnj@vt.edu.

Funding

The Role of Ion Transport in Glioma Migration, Proliferation, and ApoptosisR01NS036692 · NINDS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI SONTHEIMER, HARALD W · 1997 to 2024
$6.8M
Glioma-Astrocyte Vascular InteractionsR01NS082851 · NINDS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI SONTHEIMER, HARALD W · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036692NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translational challenges associated with reductionist modeling approaches, as well as ethical concerns and economic implications of small animal testing, drive the need for developing microphysiological neural systems for modeling human neurological diseases, disorders, and injuries. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of microphysiological brain and neural systems-on-a-chip (NSCs) for modeling higher order trajectories in the human nervous system. Societal, economic, and national security impacts of neurological diseases, disorders, and injuries are highlighted to identify critical NSC application spaces. Hierarchical design and manufacturing of NSCs are discussed with distinction for surface- and bulk-based systems. Three broad NSC classes are identified and reviewed: microfluidic NSCs, compartmentalized NSCs, and hydrogel NSCs. Emerging areas and future directions are highlighted, including the application of 3D printing to design and manufacturing of next-generation NSCs, the use of stem cells for constructing patient-specific NSCs, and the application of human NSCs to 'personalized neurology'. Technical hurdles and remaining challenges are discussed. This review identifies the state-of-the-art design methodologies, manufacturing approaches, and performance capabilities of NSCs. This work suggests NSCs appear poised to revolutionize the modeling of human neurological diseases, disorders, and injuries.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesAnimalsBrainDrug DiscoveryHumansNervous System Diseases3D bioprinting3D cell cultureBrain-on-a-chipMicrofluidicsNervous system-on-a-chipOrgan-on-a-chip

Identifiers

PMID28488234
PMCPMC5534264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.