ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2017
[Differential diagnosis of granulomatous diseases].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of inspection surveillance in detecting bovine tuberculosis during slaughter in Rio Grande do Sul.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- [Sarcoidosis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2023Article
- Chronic Granulomatous Inflammation after CyPass® Implantation.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology, granulomatous diseases remain a diagnostic challenge for the clinician as well as for the pathologist. However, establishing the correct diagnosis of these diseases is a crucial prerequisite of targeted therapy. It is particularly essential to distinguish between an infectious and a non-infectious cause, since anti-infectious and anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive approaches are opposing. Failure to establish the correct diagnosis can lead to adverse consequences for the patient. An interdisciplinary approach and a critical assessment of clinical, laboratory-chemical, microbiological, imaging, and anatomical-pathological findings are crucial for the evaluation of granulomatous disorders. This overview summarizes important landmarks and their value in the interplay of arriving at the correct diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28488047What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.