Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28488021›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2018

Striatal reward sensitivity predicts therapy-related neural changes in alcohol addiction.

Alena Becker, Martin Fungisai Gerchen, Martina Kirsch, Sabine Hoffmann, Falk Kiefer, Peter Kirsch

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Translational research as prerequisite for personalized psychiatry.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alena BeckerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/ Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. alena.becker@zi-mannheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4565-3649
Martin Fungisai GerchenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/ Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Martina KirschDepartment of Addiction Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/ Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Sabine HoffmannDepartment of Addiction Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/ Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Falk KieferDepartment of Addiction Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/ Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Peter KirschDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/ Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 636/ D6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in reward sensitivity along with weakened executive control are characteristic for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Emerging translational models of psychotherapy propose the integration of such neurobiological risk profiles to elucidate the mechanisms underlying behavior change in order to improve intervention efficacy. The primary aim of the study was to investigate whether striatal baseline reward sensitivity can be used as a neurobiological predictor of intervention-specific changes in neural functioning during AUD therapy. Fifty-eight detoxified AUD patients were randomly assigned to either receive cue exposure training (CET + TAU, N = 40) or treatment as usual (TAU only, N = 18). Pre- and post-treatment sensitivity to reward was assessed by a functional magnetic resonance imaging monetary reward paradigm. A moderated multiple regression analysis revealed a positive relationship between striatal baseline reward sensitivity and activation changes in the superior frontal gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) after CET + TAU in contrast to a negative relationship after TAU only. Over all subjects, a stronger signal change in the superior frontal gyrus and ACC was associated with increased self-efficacy to abstain alcohol. These results provide evidence that reward sensitivity at baseline predicts neural changes in inhibitory networks after receiving CET + TAU. Striatal reward sensitivity might be a promising neurobiological marker to inform therapeutic decisions.

Indexed as

AlcoholismRewardAdolescentAdultAgedCorpus StriatumCuesFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImplosive TherapyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOxygenOxygenAlcohol dependenceCue exposure trainingFunctional magnetic resonance imagingPrefrontal cortexReward processingStriatum

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.