Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28487703›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Heritable Genomic Fragment Deletions and Small Indels in the Putative ENGase Gene Induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in Barley.

Eszter Kapusi, Maria Corcuera-Gómez, Stanislav Melnik, Eva Stoger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. An EfficientPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Genome Editing and Designer Crops for the Future.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eszter KapusiDepartment of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life SciencesVienna, Austria.
Maria Corcuera-GómezDepartment of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life SciencesVienna, Austria.
Stanislav MelnikDepartment of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life SciencesVienna, Austria.
Eva StogerDepartment of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life SciencesVienna, Austria.
BOKU University · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 1461Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted genome editing with the CRISPR/Cas9 system has been used extensively for the selective mutation of plant genes. Here we used CRISPR/Cas9 to disrupt the putative barley (

Indexed as

barleycerealsCRISPR/Cascropgenome editingHordeum vulgareinduced mutation

Identifiers

PMID28487703
PMCPMC5404177
OpenAlexW2608025178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.