Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28487577›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy

Nasal-Swab Results for Methicillin-Resistant

Josée Rioux, Jenny Edwards, Lauren Bresee, Adrian Abu-Ulba, Stephen Yu, Deonne Dersch-Mills, Ben Wilson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Methicillin-resistantOman journal of ophthalmology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Josée RiouxBScPharm, ACPR, is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta.
Jenny EdwardsBScPharm, ACPR, is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta.
Lauren BreseeBScPharm, ACPR, MSc, PhD, is with the Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, and the O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, Ontario.
Adrian Abu-UlbaBScPharm, is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta.
Stephen YuBScPharm, is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta.
Deonne Dersch-MillsBScPharm, ACPR, PharmD, is with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta.
Ben WilsonMD, FRCPC, is with the Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Alberta Health Services · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNasal-swab screening for methicillin-resistant

objectiveTo describe the diagnostic characteristics of nasal-swab screening in predicting MRSA infections in hospitalized patients receiving empiric treatment with IV vancomycin.

methodsA retrospective observational chart review was conducted for newly admitted adult patients of the Peter Lougheed Centre in Calgary, Alberta, who were treated empirically with IV vancomycin from January to October 2015 and who underwent nasal-swab screening for MRSA. The diagnostic characteristics of nasal-swab screening were calculated in relation to corresponding culture results for samples collected on admission.

resultsFor the 273 patients included in this study, nasal-swab screening for MRSA showed the following diagnostic characteristics in relation to bacterial culture results: sensitivity 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.6%-83.5%), specificity 93.9% (95% CI 90.0%-96.3%), positive predictive value 30.4% (95% CI 14.1%-53.0%), negative predictive value 98.0% (95% CI 95.1%-99.3%), positive likelihood ratio 9.5 (95% CI 4.9-18.7), and negative likelihood ratio 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.9).

conclusionsGiven the high specificity of this rapid method, clinicians should ensure that patients who are receiving empiric treatment for MRSA infection and who have a positive result on nasal-swab screening continue to receive MRSA coverage until culture results are available. In addition, the high negative predictive value and positive likelihood ratio for nasal-swab screening in a low-prevalence setting suggest that a negative result significantly reduces the probability of MRSA infection. Although nasal-swab screening for MRSA is currently used for determining isolation precautions, this method also had utility in helping clinicians to predict the probability of MRSA infection and in guiding decisions about antimicrobial therapy.

Indexed as

infectionmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusMRSAnasal swabsvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID28487577
PMCPMC5407419
OpenAlexW2611789836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.