Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28487465›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2017

Geriatric Assessment Predicts Survival and Competing Mortality in Elderly Patients with Early Colorectal Cancer: Can It Help in Adjuvant Therapy Decision-Making?

Maite Antonio, Juana Saldaña, Alberto Carmona-Bayonas, Valentín Navarro, Cristian Tebé, Marga Nadal, Francesc Formiga, Ramon Salazar, Josep Maria Borràs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. General recommendations paper on the management of older patients with cancer: the SEOM geriatric oncology task force's position statement.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Guidance for Treating the Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  10. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Influence of age on variation in patterns of care in patients with rectal cancer in Catalonia (Spain).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maite AntonioMedical Oncology Department, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-Hospital Duran i Reynals, University of Barcelona, Spain mantonio@iconcologia.net.
Juana SaldañaMedical Oncology Department, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-Hospital Duran i Reynals, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Alberto Carmona-BayonasMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Valentín NavarroResearch Clinical Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-Hospital Duran I Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristian TebéStatisical Assessment Service, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL) and Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Spain.
Marga NadalResearch Management Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-Hospital Duran I Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesc FormigaInternal Medicine Service, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Ramon SalazarMedical Oncology Department, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-Hospital Duran i Reynals, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Josep Maria BorràsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona and Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Spain.
Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESDuran i Reynals Hospital · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe challenge when selecting elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for adjuvant therapy is to estimate the likelihood that death from other causes will preclude cancer events from occurring. The aim of this paper is to evaluate whether comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can predict survival and cancer-specific mortality in elderly CRC patients candidates for adjuvant therapy. MATERIAL AND

methodsOne hundred ninety-five consecutive patients aged ≥75 with high-risk stage II and stage III CRC were prospectively included from May 2008 to May 2015. All patients underwent CGA, which evaluated comorbidity, polypharmacy, functional status, geriatric syndromes, mood, cognition, and social support. According to CGA results, patients were classified into three groups-fit, medium-fit, and unfit-to receive standard therapy, adjusted treatment, and best supportive care, respectively. We recorded survival and cause of death and used the Fine-Gray regression model to analyze competing causes of death.

resultsFollowing CGA, 85 (43%) participants were classified as fit, 57 (29%) as medium-fit, and 53 (28%) as unfit. The univariate 5-year survival rates were 74%, 52%, and 27%. Sixty-one (31%) patients died due to cancer progression (53%), non-cancer-related cause (46%), and unknown reasons (1%); there were no toxicity-related deaths. Fit and medium-fit participants were more likely to die due to cancer progression, whereas patients classified as unfit were at significantly greater risk of non-cancer-related death.

conclusionCGA showed efficacy in predicting survival and discriminating between causes of death in elderly patients with high-risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with potential implications for shaping the decision-making process for adjuvant therapies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer is controversial due to the high risk for competing events among these patients. In order to effectively select older patients for adjuvant therapy, we have to weigh the risk of cancer-related mortality and the potential survival benefits with treatment against the patient's life expectancy, irrespective of cancer. This prospective study focused on the prognostic value of geriatric assessment for survival using a competing-risk analysis approach, providing an important contribution on the treatment decision-making process and helping clinicians to identify elderly patients who might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy among those who will not.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentPrognosisAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsAdjuvant therapyColorectal cancerCompeting risk modelComprehensive geriatric assessmentDecision‐makingElderly

Identifiers

PMID28487465
PMCPMC5553962
OpenAlexW2612106626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.