Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28487435›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2017

Risk of acute myocardial infarction with NSAIDs in real world use: bayesian meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Michèle Bally, Nandini Dendukuri, Benjamin Rich, Lyne Nadeau, Arja Helin-Salmivaara, Edeltraut Garbe, James M Brophy

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 215 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
215citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
45.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

215 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 513 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Low dose NSAIDs and sysadoas in the management of knee osteoarthritis.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. A Combination ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2019
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

155 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michèle BallyDepartment of Pharmacy and Research Centre, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, H2X 1N4, Canada michele.bally.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.
Nandini DendukuriTechnology Assessment Unit of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Benjamin RichDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre-Research Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Lyne NadeauDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre-Research Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Arja Helin-SalmivaaraUnit of Primary Care, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki, Finland.
Edeltraut GarbeDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
James M BrophyDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CAMcGill University · CAHospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa · FILeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBayes TheoremCanadaDose-Response Relationship, DrugEuropeHumansMyocardial InfarctionAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID28487435
PMCPMC5423546
OpenAlexW2613818341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.