ArticleActa biomaterialia2017
Towards rebuilding vaginal support utilizing an extracellular matrix bioscaffold.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological Grafts for the Surgical Management of Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Narrative Overview of the Evolution of Biomaterials.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Proteomic insights into vaginal mesh complications and treatment targets.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Epidemiology, etiology and treatment of female vaginal injury.Reproductive health · 2025Review
- The use of animal models in preclinical investigations for the development of a surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2024Review
- Dysregulated wound healing in the pathogenesis of urogynecologic mesh complications.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Supramolecular Fibrous Hydrogel Augmentation of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Extracellular Matrix-Based and Electrospun Scaffolding Systems for Vaginal Reconstruction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development potential of extracellular matrix hydrogels as hemostatic materials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Mesh deformation: A mechanism underlying polypropylene prolapse mesh complications in vivo.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Article
- Urinary basement membrane graft-augmented sacrospinous ligament suspension: a description of technique and short-term outcomes.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Review
- Emerging Nano/Micro-Structured Degradable Polymeric Meshes for Pelvic Floor Reconstruction.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Sacrocolpopexy: Patient Outcomes Support the Use of Non-Crosslinked Acellular Dermal Matrix as an Alternative to the Synthetic Polypropylene Mesh.Journal of gynecologic surgery · 2019Article
- Landmarks in vaginal mesh development: polypropylene mesh for treatment of SUI and POP.Nature reviews. Urology · 2019Review
- Mesenchymal stem cell-based bioengineered constructs: foreign body response, cross-talk with macrophages and impact of biomaterial design strategies for pelvic floor disorders.Interface focus · 2019Review
- Repair of colonic neovaginal stenosis using a biological graft in a male-to-female transgender patient.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Recent advances in pelvic floor repair.F1000Research · 2019Review
- Extracellular matrix-derived biomaterials in engineering cell function.Biotechnology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As an alternative to polypropylene mesh, we explored an extracellular matrix (ECM) bioscaffold derived from urinary bladder matrix (MatriStem™) in the repair of vaginal prolapse. We aimed to restore disrupted vaginal support simulating application via transvaginal and transabdominal approaches in a macaque model focusing on the impact on vaginal structure, function, and the host immune response. In 16 macaques, after laparotomy, the uterosacral ligaments and paravaginal attachments to pelvic side wall were completely transected (IACUC# 13081928). 6-ply MatriStem was cut into posterior and anterior templates with a portion covering the vagina and arms simulating uterosacral ligaments and paravaginal attachments, respectively. After surgically exposing the correct anatomical sites, in 8 animals, a vaginal incision was made on the anterior and posterior vagina and the respective scaffolds were passed into the vagina via these incisions (transvaginal insertion) prior to placement. The remaining 8 animals underwent the same surgery without vaginal incisions (transabdominal insertion). Three months post implantation, firm tissue bands extending from vagina to pelvic side wall appeared in both MatriStem groups. Experimental endpoints examining impact of MatriStem on the vagina demonstrated that vaginal biochemical and biomechanical parameters, smooth muscle thickness and contractility, and immune responses were similar in the MatriStem no incision group and sham-operated controls. In the MatriStem incision group, a 41% decrease in vaginal stiffness (P=0.042), a 22% decrease in collagen content (P=0.008) and a 25% increase in collagen subtypes III/I was observed vs. Sham. Active MMP2 was increased in both Matristem groups vs. Sham (both P=0.002). This study presents a novel application of ECM bioscaffolds as a first step towards the rebuilding of vaginal support. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition related to failure of the supportive soft tissues of the vagina; particularly at the apex and mid-vagina. Few studies have investigated methods to regenerate these failed structures. The overall goal of the study was to determine the feasibility of utilizing a regenerative bioscaffold in prolapse applications to restore apical (level I) and lateral (level II) support to the vagina without negatively impacting vaginal structure and function. The significance of our findings is two fold: 1. Implantation of properly constructed extracellular matrix grafts promoted rebuilding of level I and level II support to the vagina and did not negatively impact the overall functional, morphological and biochemical properties of the vagina. 2. The presence of vaginal incisions in the transvaginal insertion of bioscaffolds may compromise vaginal structural integrity in the short term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.