Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28487054›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2017

Reduced-cost Chlamydia trachomatis-specific multiplex real-time PCR diagnostic assay evaluated for ocular swabs and use by trachoma research programmes.

Robert Butcher, Jo Houghton, Tamsyn Derrick, Athumani Ramadhani, Beatriz Herrera, Anna R Last, Patrick A Massae, Matthew J Burton, Martin J Holland, Chrissy H Roberts

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trachoma risk factors in Oromia Region, Ethiopia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparison of Face Washing and Face Wiping Methods for Trachoma Control: A Pilot Study.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert ButcherClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: robert.butcher@lshtm.ac.uk.
Jo HoughtonClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Tamsyn DerrickClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom; Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Athumani RamadhaniClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom; Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Beatriz HerreraClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Anna R LastClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Patrick A MassaeKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Matthew J BurtonClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Martin J HollandClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Chrissy H RobertsClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of London · GBKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZ

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098521/B/12/ZWellcome Trust 105609/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust GR079246MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTrachoma, caused by the intracellular bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct), is the leading infectious cause of preventable blindness. Many commercial platforms are available that provide highly sensitive and specific detection of Ct DNA. However, the majority of these commercial platforms are inaccessible for population-level surveys in resource-limited settings typical to trachoma control programmes. We developed two low-cost quantitative PCR (qPCR) tests for Ct using readily available reagents on standard real-time thermocyclers.

methodsEach multiplex qPCR test targets one genomic and one plasmid Ct target in addition to an endogenous positive control for Homo sapiens DNA. The quantitative performance of the qPCR assays in clinical samples was determined by comparison to a previously evaluated droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) test. The diagnostic performance of the qPCR assays were evaluated against a commercial assay (artus C. trachomatis Plus RG PCR, Qiagen) using molecular diagnostics quality control standards and clinical samples. We examined the yield of Ct DNA prepared from five different DNA extraction kits and a cold chain-free dry-sample preservation method using swabs spiked with fixed concentrations of human and Ct DNA.

resultsThe qPCR assay was highly reproducible (Ct plasmid and genomic targets mean total coefficients of variance 41.5% and 48.3%, respectively). The assay detected 8/8 core specimens upon testing of a quality control panel and performed well in comparison to commercially marketed comparator test (sensitivity and specificity>90%). Optimal extraction and sample preservation methods for research applications were identified.

conclusionWe describe a pipeline from collection to diagnosis providing the most efficient sample preservation and extraction with significant per test cost savings over a commercial qPCR diagnostic assay. The assay and its evaluation should allow control programs wishing to conduct independent research within the context of trachoma control, access to an affordable test with defined performance characteristics.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisDNA, BacterialEyeGenome, BacterialHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPlasmidsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingTrachomaDNA, BacterialChlamydia trachomatisDiagnosisQuantitative PCRTrachoma

Identifiers

PMID28487054
PMCPMC5496587
OpenAlexW2611827190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.