Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28486974›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2017

Cell separation in kiwifruit without development of a specialised detachment zone.

Roneel Prakash, Ian C Hallett, Sally F Wong, Sarah L Johnston, Erin M O'Donoghue, Peter A McAtee, Alan G Seal, Ross G Atkinson, Roswitha Schröder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Characterization and Identification of a Ripening-Related GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roneel PrakashThe New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited (PFR), Mount Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92169, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Ian C HallettPFR, Mount Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92169, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Sally F WongPFR, Mount Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92169, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Sarah L JohnstonPFR, Hawke's Bay Research Centre, Cnr Crosses and St George's Roads, Havelock North, 4130, New Zealand.
Erin M O'DonoghuePFR, Food Industry Science Centre, Fitzherbert Science Centre, Batchelar Road, Palmerston North, 4474, New Zealand.
Peter A McAteePFR, Mount Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92169, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Alan G SealPFR, Te Puke Research Centre, 412 No 1 Road RD 2, Te Puke, 3182, New Zealand.
Ross G AtkinsonPFR, Mount Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92169, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Roswitha SchröderPFR, Mount Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92169, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand. rosie.schroeder@plantandfood.co.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-1554-2606
Mt Albert Primary School · NZPlant & Food Research · NZHawke's Bay Regional Council · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnlike in abscission or dehiscence, fruit of kiwifruit Actinidia eriantha develop the ability for peel detachment when they are ripe and soft in the absence of a morphologically identifiable abscission zone. Two closely-related genotypes with contrasting detachment behaviour have been identified. The 'good-peeling' genotype has detachment with clean debonding of cells, and a peel tissue that does not tear. The 'poor-peeling' genotype has poor detachability, with cells that rupture upon debonding, and peel tissue that fragments easily.

resultsStructural studies indicated that peel detachability in both genotypes occurred in the outer pericarp beneath the hypodermis. Immunolabelling showed differences in methylesterification of pectin, where the interface of labelling coincided with the location of detachment in the good-peeling genotype, whereas in the poor-peeling genotype, no such interface existed. This zone of difference in methylesterification was enhanced by differential cell wall changes between the peel and outer pericarp tissue. Although both genotypes expressed two polygalacturonase genes, no enzyme activity was detected in the good-peeling genotype, suggesting limited pectin breakdown, keeping cell walls strong without tearing or fragmentation of the peel and flesh upon detachment. Differences in location and amounts of wall-stiffening galactan in the peel of the good-peeling genotype possibly contributed to this phenotype. Hemicellulose-acting transglycosylases were more active in the good-peeling genotype, suggesting an influence on peel flexibility by remodelling their substrates during development of detachability. High xyloglucanase activity in the peel of the good-peeling genotype may contribute by having a strengthening effect on the cellulose-xyloglucan network.

conclusionsIn fruit of A. eriantha, peel detachability is due to the establishment of a zone of discontinuity created by differential cell wall changes in peel and outer pericarp tissues that lead to changes in mechanical properties of the peel. During ripening, the peel becomes flexible and the cells continue to adhere strongly to each other, preventing breakage, whereas the underlying outer pericarp loses cell wall strength as softening proceeds. Together these results reveal a novel and interesting mechanism for enabling cell separation.

Indexed as

ActinidiaCell WallEsterificationFruitGalactansGene ExpressionGenes, PlantGenotypeMethylationMonosaccharidesPectinsPlant CellsPolysaccharidesGalactanshemicelluloseMonosaccharidesPectinsPolysaccharidesCell wallDetachmentKiwifruitPeelingPolygalacturonaseTransglycosylase

Identifiers

PMID28486974
PMCPMC5424339
OpenAlexW2614091916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.