Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28486691›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2017

Combined kinase inhibitors of MEK1/2 and either PI3K or PDGFR are efficacious in intracranial triple-negative breast cancer.

Amanda E D Van Swearingen, Maria J Sambade, Marni B Siegel, Shivani Sud, Robert S McNeill, Samantha M Bevill, Xin Chen, Ryan E Bash, Louisa Mounsey, Brian T Golitz and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Design, synthesis, molecular docking, andSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. New strategies for targeting kinase networks in cancer.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda E D Van SwearingenLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Maria J SambadeLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Marni B SiegelLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Shivani SudLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Robert S McNeillLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Samantha M BevillLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Xin ChenLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Ryan E BashLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Louisa MounseyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Brian T GolitzLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Charlene SantosLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Allison DealLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Joel S ParkerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Naim RashidLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
C Ryan MillerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Gary L JohnsonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Carey K AndersLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Genetics, Pharmacology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory Animal Medicine, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Divisions of Neuropathology, Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, and Neurology and Neurosciences Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Establishing Genetic Drivers of Breast Cancer MetastasesF30CA200345 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SIEGEL, MARNI B · 2015 to 2018
$151k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA200345NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), lacking expression of hormone and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptors, is an aggressive subtype that frequently metastasizes to the brain and has no FDA-approved systemic therapies. Previous literature demonstrates mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) pathway activation in TNBC brain metastases. Thus, we aimed to discover rational combinatorial therapies with MEK inhibition, hypothesizing that co-inhibition using clinically available brain-penetrant inhibitors would improve survival in preclinical models of TNBC brain metastases.

methodsUsing human-derived TNBC cell lines, synthetic lethal small interfering RNA kinase screens were evaluated with brain-penetrant inhibitors against MEK1/2 (selumetinib, AZD6244) or phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K; buparlisib, BKM120). Mice bearing intracranial TNBC tumors (SUM149, MDA-MB-231Br, MDA-MB-468, or MDA-MB-436) were treated with MEK, PI3K, or platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR; pazopanib) inhibitors alone or in combination. Tumors were analyzed by western blot and multiplexed kinase inhibitor beads/mass spectrometry to assess treatment effects.

resultsScreens identified MEK+PI3K and MEK+PDGFR inhibitors as tractable, rational combinations. Dual treatment of selumetinib with buparlisib or pazopanib was synergistic in TNBC cells in vitro. Both combinations improved survival in intracranial SUM149 and MDA-MB-231Br, but not MDA-MB-468 or MDA-MB-436. Treatments decreased mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and PI3K (Akt) signaling in sensitive (SUM149 and 231Br) but not resistant models (MDA-MB-468). Exploratory analysis of kinome reprogramming in SUM149 intracranial tumors after MEK ± PI3K inhibition demonstrates extensive kinome changes with treatment, especially in MAPK pathway members.

conclusionsResults demonstrate that rational combinations of the clinically available inhibitors selumetinib with buparlisib or pazopanib may prove to be promising therapeutic strategies for the treatment of some TNBC brain metastases. Additionally, effective combination treatments cause widespread alterations in kinase pathways, including targetable potential resistance drivers.

Indexed as

Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsAnimalsApoptosisBrain NeoplasmsCell ProliferationDrug SynergismFemaleHumansMAP Kinase Kinase 1MAP Kinase Kinase 2MicePhosphorylationProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor betaSignal TransductionMAP2K1 protein, humanMAP2K2 protein, humanMAP Kinase Kinase 1MAP Kinase Kinase 2Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor betabrain metastasesMEK inhibitorPI3K inhibitorrational combinationstriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID28486691
PMCPMC5737524
OpenAlexW2612444138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.