Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28486370›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2017

Maternal Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Neonatal Birth Outcomes With and Without Assisted Reproduction.

Sara Crawford, Nikhil Joshi, Sheree L Boulet, Marie A Bailey, Maria-Elena Hood, Susan E Manning, Patricia McKane, Russell S Kirby, Dmitry M Kissin, Denise J Jamieson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The effect of donor and recipient race on outcomes of assisted reproduction.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara CrawfordDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; the Florida Department of Health, Division of Public Health Statistics and Performance Management, Tallahassee, Florida; the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, Michigan; and the University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Nikhil Joshi
Sheree L Boulet
Marie A Bailey
Maria-Elena Hood
Susan E Manning
Patricia McKane
Russell S Kirby
Dmitry M Kissin
Denise J Jamieson
States Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (SMART) Collaborative
Florida Department of Health · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore disparities in prematurity and low birth weight (LBW) by maternal race and ethnicity among singletons conceived with and without assisted reproductive technology (ART).

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using resident birth certificate data from Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan linked with data from the National ART Surveillance System from 2000 to 2010. There were 4,568,822 live births, of which 64,834 were conceived with ART. We compared maternal and ART cycle characteristics of singleton liveborn neonates using χ tests across maternal race and ethnicity groups. We used log binomial models to explore associations between maternal race and ethnicity and LBW and preterm birth by ART conception status.

resultsThe proportion of liveborn neonates conceived with ART differed by maternal race and ethnicity (P<.01). It was smallest among neonates of non-Hispanic black (0.3%) and Hispanic women (0.6%) as compared with neonates of non-Hispanic white (2.0%) and Asian or Pacific Islander women (1.9%). The percentages of LBW or preterm singletons were highest for neonates of non-Hispanic black women both for non-ART (11.3% and 12.4%) and ART (16.1% and 19.1%) -conceived neonates. After adjusting for maternal factors, the risks of LBW or preterm birth for singletons born to non-Hispanic black mothers were 2.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.10-2.14] and 1.56 (95% CI 1.54-1.57) times higher for non-ART neonates and 1.87 (95% CI 1.57-2.23) and 1.56 (95% CI 1.34-1.83) times higher for ART neonates compared with neonates of non-Hispanic white women. The adjusted risk for LBW was also significantly higher for ART and non-ART singletons born to Hispanic (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.26, 95% CI 1.09-1.47 and adjusted RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.16) and Asian or Pacific Islander (adjusted RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16-1.65 and adjusted RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.52-1.58) women compared with non-Hispanic white women.

conclusionDisparities in adverse perinatal outcomes by maternal race and ethnicity persisted for neonates conceived with and without ART.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesAdultCohort StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaternal-Child Health ServicesMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, AssistedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28486370
PMCPMC5590368
OpenAlexW2612343695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.