ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2017
Changes in Myomectomy Practice After the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Safety Communication on Power Morcellation.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances and Challenges in Minimally Invasive Myomectomy: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Pressure-Induced Fibroid Ischemia: First-In-Human Experience with a Novel Device for Laparoscopic Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Article
- Fibroid Removal after Myomectomy: An Overview on the Problems of Power Morcellation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Technique for transvaginal removal of large specimen using an Alexis Contained Extraction System during laparoscopic hysterectomy.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2022Article
- Route of myomectomy and fertility: a prospective cohort study.Fertility and sterility · 2022Article
- Intraperitoneal Triamcinolone Reduces Postoperative Adhesions, Possibly through Alteration of Mitochondrial Function.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- What We Know about the Long-Term Risks of Hysterectomy for Benign Indication-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- The Number of Myomas Is the Most Important Risk Factor for Blood Loss and Total Operation Time in Robotic Myomectomy: Analysis of 242 Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Abdominal Myomectomy for Large Myomas Sized over 10 cm or Weighing 250 g.Yonsei medical journal · 2020Article
- Prevalence and occult rates of uterine leiomyosarcoma.Medicine · 2020Observational
- Hysterectomy Practice Patterns in the Postmorcellation Era.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2019Article
- Incidence and groups at risk for unexpected uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Dutch nationwide cohort study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2019Article
- Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the association between the 2014 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication on power morcellation and surgical approach and morbidity after myomectomy.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, data were abstracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database on 3,160 myomectomies between April 2012 and December 2013 (pre-FDA) and 4,378 between April 2014 and December 2015 (post-FDA). Aims were to 1) compare rates of abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy pre-FDA and post-FDA (primary outcome), 2) directly compare the morbidity of abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy during each time period (secondary outcome 1), and 3) compare the morbidity after all myomectomies performed pre-FDA and post-FDA (secondary outcome 2). Adjusted means, odds ratios, and rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using linear, logistic, and Poisson regression, respectively, adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, body mass index, and myoma burden.
resultsMyomectomies performed post-FDA were more likely to be abdominal (60.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 58.6-61.5%) than laparoscopic (40.0%, 95% CI 38.5-41.4%) as compared with myomectomies pre-FDA, which were equally divided between surgical approaches (49.1% abdominal, 95% CI 47.4-50.9% compared with 50.9% laparoscopic, 95% CI 49.1-52.6%; P<.001). When directly compared with laparoscopic myomectomy, abdominal myomectomy was associated with longer hospitalizations, higher readmission rates, and greater morbidity both pre-FDA and post-FDA (P<.05, all comparisons). Adjusted models demonstrated shorter operative times post-FDA for all myomectomies (P<.001), although composite morbidity was similar between myomectomies performed pre-FDA and post-FDA (P=.809).
conclusionsThe FDA safety communication on power morcellation was associated with an 11% absolute increase in the use of abdominal myomectomy. Although morbidity is consistently higher after abdominal as compared with laparoscopic myomectomy, the increased reliance on abdominal myomectomy post-FDA did not result in clinically significant changes in morbidity in this cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.