ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2017
Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between High-Risk Pregnancy History and High-Efficacy Postpartum Contraception Use in North Carolina.Maternal and child health journal · 2026Article
- Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use Among People With Sickle Cell Disease in the United States.O&G open · 2026Article
- Postpartum Tubal Sterilization in Sickle Cell Disease in the 2012-2019 National Inpatient Sample.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2025Article
- Pennsylvania Medicaid policy and rural hospital implementation of immediate postpartum contraception.Contraception · 2025Article
- Inpatient Adolescent Sexual Health Services and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Training.Hospital pediatrics · 2025Article
- Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use after Non-Receipt of Postpartum Permanent Contraception: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2025Article
- Postpartum Patient Perspectives on the US Medicaid Waiting Period for Permanent Contraception.Open access journal of contraception · 2025Article
- Decision-making regarding immediate vs. interval postpartum levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion timing.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2023Article
- Uptake of postplacental intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Association of Opioid Use Disorder and Provision of Highly Effective Inpatient Postpartum Contraception.Open access journal of contraception · 2023Article
- Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use Following State-Specific Changes in Hospital Medicaid Reimbursement.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Changes in Rates of Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the USA, 2012-2016.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Article
- Analysis of Postpartum Uptake of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Before and After Implementation of Medicaid Reimbursement Policy.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Article
- Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Practices in Postpartum Sterilization Without a Valid Medicaid Consent Form.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Article
- Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Association of Insurance Status With Provision of Recommended Services During Comprehensive Postpartum Visits.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Attitudes and beliefs of obstetricians-gynecologists regarding Medicaid postpartum sterilization - A qualitative study.Contraception · 2020Article
- Champions in context: which attributes matter for change efforts in healthcare?Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Patient perceptions of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: A qualitative study.Contraception · 2020Article
- Report of the Office of Population Affairs' expert work group meeting on short birth spacing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Methodological quality of existing studies and future directions for research.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo measure rates of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants, and tubal sterilization during delivery hospitalizations and correlates of their use.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used the 2008-2013 National Inpatient Sample, a publicly available all-payer database. We identified delivery hospitalizations with the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes for intrauterine device insertion, contraceptive implant insertion, and tubal sterilization. We used weighted multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between predictors (age, delivery mode, medical comorbidity, payer, hospital type, geographic region, and year) and likelihood of LARC and sterilization and to compare characteristics of LARC and sterilization users.
resultsOur sample included 4,691,683 discharges, representing 22,667,204 delivery hospitalizations. Long-acting reversible contraception insertion increased from 1.86 per 10,000 deliveries (2008-2009) to 13.5 per 10,000 deliveries (2012-2013; P<.001); tubal sterilization remained stable (711-683 per 10,000 deliveries; P=.24). In multivariable analysis adjusting for all predictors, compared with neither LARC nor sterilization, LARC use was highest among women with medical comorbidities (count per 10,000 deliveries: 15.04, standard error 2.11, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72-2.13), nonprivate payer (13.50, standard error 2.14, adjusted OR 5.23, 95% CI 3.82-7.16), and at urban teaching hospitals (14.92, standard error 2.25, adjusted OR 20.85, 95% CI 12.73-34.15). Sterilization was least likely among women aged 24 years or younger (251.04, standard error 4.88, adjusted OR 0.12 95% CI 0.12-0.13, compared with 35 years or older) and most likely with cesarean delivery (1,568.74, standard error 20.81, adjusted OR 6.25, 95% CI 5.88-6.63). Comparing only LARC and sterilization users, LARC users tended to have nonprivate insurance (84.95% compared with 57.17%, adjusted OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.38-2.63) and deliver at urban teaching hospitals (94.65% compared with 45.47%, adjusted OR 38.39, 23.52-62.64) in later study years (2012-2013; 55.72% compared with 32.18%, adjusted OR 8.26, 95% CI 4.42-15.44, compared with 2008-2009).
conclusionLong-acting reversible contraception insertion increased from 1.86 to 13.5 per 10,000 deliveries but remained less than 2% of the sterilization rate. Inpatient postpartum LARC insertion is more likely among sicker, poorer women delivering at urban teaching hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.