Trial reportBlood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis2017
Evaluation of recombinant factor VIII Fc (Eloctate) activity by thromboelastometry in a multicenter phase 3 clinical trial and correlation with bleeding phenotype.
Trial report in Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current therapeutic approaches in the management of hemophilia-a consensus view by the Romanian Society of Hematology.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Global coagulation assays in hemophilia A: A comparison to conventional assays.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
: The aim of this study was to compare the hemostatic efficacy of recombinant factor VIII Fc (rFVIIIFc) (Eloctate) and Advate by ex-vivo rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM) of whole blood and to explore potential ROTEM parameters that may be more predictive of a patient's bleeding tendency than plasma FVIII activity. Thirteen clinical sites were selected to perform ROTEM on freshly collected blood samples from 44 patients in the phase 3 study for rFVIIIFc, including 16 patients undergoing sequential pharmacokinetic assessment of Advate and rFVIIIFc. Equivalent hemostatic activity was observed for rFVIIIFc and Advate in postinfusion samples, followed by improvements for rFVIIIFc in clotting time, clot formation time and alpha angle (α) for a longer duration than Advate, consistent with the pharmacokinetic improvements reported previously for rFVIIIFc. Our study did not demonstrate a statistical correlation between a patient's ROTEM activity at baseline or at trough and the occurrence of spontaneous bleeds while on prophylactic therapy. However, an association was observed between postinfusion clotting time and the occurrence of one or more spontaneous bleeds vs. no bleeds over a follow-up period of 1 year (P = 0.003). How well a patient's whole blood clotting deficiency is corrected after a dose of FVIII may be an indicator of subsequent bleeding tendency in patients with otherwise equivalent FVIII peak and trough levels. The technical challenges of standardizing the ROTEM, largely overcome in the current study, may however preclude the use of this method for widespread assessment of global hemostasis unless additional assay controls or normalization procedures prove to be effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.