ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017
Cognitive Neuroscience: Synchronizing Brains in the Classroom.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- A framework for neurophysiological experiments on flow states.Communications psychology · 2024Review
- Metaverse in Mental Health: The Beginning of a Long History.Current psychiatry reports · 2024Review
- Searching for the Metaverse: Neuroscience of Physical and Digital Communities.Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking · 2024Article
- The Synergy Zone: Connecting the Mind, Brain, and Heart for the Ideal Classroom Learning Environment.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Using mobile brain/body imaging to advance research in arts, health, and related therapeutics.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021Review
- Neuroimaging of learning and development: improving ecological validity.Frontline learning research · 2018Article
- Commentary: Brain-to-Brain Synchrony Tracks Real-World Dynamic Group Interactions in the Classroom and Cognitive Neuroscience: Synchronizing Brains in the Classroom.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional cognitive neuroscience is based on studying single individuals in a lab. A paradigm shift is made by a new study that monitors simultaneously the brains of a dozen students in a classroom setting and demonstrates a link between brain-to-brain synchrony and classroom engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.