ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2017
Magnetic resonance imaging targeted transperineal prostate biopsy: a local anaesthetic approach.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Transperineal (TP) Versus Transrectal (TR) Prostate Biopsy: Efficacy, Safety, and Systemic Challenges-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Performance of Perineal MRI-US Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Analysis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Observational
- Local anesthesia for transperineal prostate biopsy performed under sedation: effects on intraoperative and postoperative narcotic use.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anaesthesia, Tolerability, and Functional Outcomes: A Prospective, Monocentric, and Single-Operator Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Minimizing infectious complications following transrectal prostate biopsy: a proposal for a risk-adapted antibiotic treatment strategy with Ceftriaxone and Ertapenem as key components.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Landmarks in the evolution of prostate biopsy.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Perineal nerve block versus periprostatic block for patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy (APROPOS): a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.European urology open science · 2022Review
- Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.The Prostate · 2022Article
- Pain control according to the periprostatic nerve block site in magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal targeted prostate biopsy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Economic Evaluation of Transperineal versus Transrectal Devices for Local Anaesthetic Prostate Biopsies.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2021Article
- Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications.BJUI compass · 2021Article
- Infection rate and complications after 621 transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies in local anesthesia without standard antibiotic prophylaxis.World journal of urology · 2021Observational
- Rationale and protocol for randomized study of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy efficacy and complications (ProBE-PC study).Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2021Review
- Are outpatient transperineal prostate biopsies without antibiotic prophylaxis equivalent to standard transrectal biopsies for patient safety and cancer detection rates?A retrospective cohort study in 222 patients.Patient safety in surgery · 2021Article
- Rebiopsy rate after transperineal or transrectal prostate biopsy.Prostate international · 2021Article
- Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy under intravenous anaesthesia: a clinical, microbiological and cost analysis of 2048 cases over 11 years at a tertiary institution.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2021Article
- Transperineal prostate biopsy: The modern gold standard to prostate cancer diagnosis.Turkish journal of urology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite high rates of disease misclassification and sepsis, the use of transrectal biopsy remains commonplace. Transperineal mapping biopsies mitigate these problems but carry increased cost and patient burden. Local anaesthetic, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted transperineal biopsy may offer an alternative. Here, we aim to determine the feasibility, tolerability and detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer using a local anaesthetic, transperineal, MRI-targeted biopsy technique.
methodsTertiary referral centre in which 181 consecutive men underwent local anaesthetic, transperineal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy (September 2014 to January 2016). A standardized local anaesthetic technique was used to obtain targeted biopsies using visual estimation with the number of targeted cores determined by each of a number of users. We assessed adverse events, patient visual analogue pain scores and detection rates of clinically significant cancer (defined by University College London (UCL) definitions one and two and separately by the presence of dominant and non-dominant Gleason pattern 4). We secondarily assessed detection of any cancer, rates of detection by MRI (Likert) score and by presenting PSA. Differences were assessed using Chi-squared tests (P<0.05).
resultsOne hundred eighty-one men with 243 lesions were included. There were no episodes of sepsis or re-admissions and one procedure was abandoned owing to patient discomfort. Twenty-three out of 25 (92%) men would recommend the procedure to another. Median visual analogue pain score was 1.0 (interquartile range: 0.0-2.4). A total 104/181 (57%) had UCL definition 1 disease (Gleason ⩾4+3 and/or maximum cancer length ⩾6 mm) and 129/181 (71%) had UCL definition 2 cancer (Gleason ⩾3+4 and/or maximum cancer length ⩾4 mm). Fifty-four out of 181 (30%) and 124/181 (69%) had dominant and non-dominant pattern 4 disease or greater (irrespective of cancer length). Any cancer was detected in 142/181 (78%). Significant disease was more likely in higher MRI-scoring lesions and in men with PSAs ⩾10 ng ml
conclusionsThis approach to prostate biopsy is feasible, tolerable and can be performed in ambulatory settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.