Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28485391›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2017

Magnetic resonance imaging targeted transperineal prostate biopsy: a local anaesthetic approach.

E J Bass, I A Donaldson, A Freeman, C Jameson, S Punwani, C Moore, M Arya, M Emberton, H U Ahmed

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Landmarks in the evolution of prostate biopsy.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E J BassDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
I A DonaldsonDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
A FreemanDepartment of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
C JamesonDepartment of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
S PunwaniCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
C MooreDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
M AryaDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
M EmbertonDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
H U AhmedDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701302Medical Research Council G1002509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite high rates of disease misclassification and sepsis, the use of transrectal biopsy remains commonplace. Transperineal mapping biopsies mitigate these problems but carry increased cost and patient burden. Local anaesthetic, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted transperineal biopsy may offer an alternative. Here, we aim to determine the feasibility, tolerability and detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer using a local anaesthetic, transperineal, MRI-targeted biopsy technique.

methodsTertiary referral centre in which 181 consecutive men underwent local anaesthetic, transperineal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy (September 2014 to January 2016). A standardized local anaesthetic technique was used to obtain targeted biopsies using visual estimation with the number of targeted cores determined by each of a number of users. We assessed adverse events, patient visual analogue pain scores and detection rates of clinically significant cancer (defined by University College London (UCL) definitions one and two and separately by the presence of dominant and non-dominant Gleason pattern 4). We secondarily assessed detection of any cancer, rates of detection by MRI (Likert) score and by presenting PSA. Differences were assessed using Chi-squared tests (P<0.05).

resultsOne hundred eighty-one men with 243 lesions were included. There were no episodes of sepsis or re-admissions and one procedure was abandoned owing to patient discomfort. Twenty-three out of 25 (92%) men would recommend the procedure to another. Median visual analogue pain score was 1.0 (interquartile range: 0.0-2.4). A total 104/181 (57%) had UCL definition 1 disease (Gleason ⩾4+3 and/or maximum cancer length ⩾6 mm) and 129/181 (71%) had UCL definition 2 cancer (Gleason ⩾3+4 and/or maximum cancer length ⩾4 mm). Fifty-four out of 181 (30%) and 124/181 (69%) had dominant and non-dominant pattern 4 disease or greater (irrespective of cancer length). Any cancer was detected in 142/181 (78%). Significant disease was more likely in higher MRI-scoring lesions and in men with PSAs ⩾10 ng ml

conclusionsThis approach to prostate biopsy is feasible, tolerable and can be performed in ambulatory settings.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, LocalHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID28485391
OpenAlexW2612474452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.