Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484986›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

Validation of a clinical pathway to assess asymptomatic renal transplant candidates using myocardial perfusion imaging.

Rami Doukky, Ibtihaj Fughhi, Tania Campagnoli, Marwan Wassouf, Michael Kharouta, Aviral Vij, Chiedozie Anokwute, Andrew Appis, Amjad Ali

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of change of ischemic burden on the outcomes of ESRD patients awaiting kidney transplantation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  5. The prognostic and diagnostic implications of surveillance serial myocardial perfusion imaging in asymptomatic renal transplant candidates.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The prognostic implications of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in patients undergoing regadenoson stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for kidney transplantation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Review
  10. The prognostic utility of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease: The largest cohort to date.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  11. The prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: The largest cohort to date.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Screening pre-renal transplant: Risk factors appear key but important questions remain.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Regadenoson use in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: A focused review.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  19. Stress SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in End-Stage Renal Disease.Current cardiovascular imaging reports · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rami DoukkyDivision of Cardiology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL, USA. rdoukky@cookcountyhhs.org.
Ibtihaj FughhiDivision of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tania CampagnoliDivision of Cardiology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marwan WassoufDepartment of Medicine, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michael KharoutaDivision of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Aviral VijDivision of Cardiology, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago, IL, USA.
Chiedozie AnokwuteDivision of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrew AppisDivision of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Amjad AliDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn AHA/ACCF scientific statement proposed 8 risk factors to assess the need for noninvasive coronary artery disease (CAD) surveillance in asymptomatic patients undergoing evaluation for kidney transplantation. The clinical application of these risk factors and the role of noninvasive testing in this context have not been defined. METHODS AND

resultsWe retrospectively followed a cohort of 581 consecutive kidney transplant recipients of whom 401 had pre-transplant radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and 90 had pre-transplant coronary angiography. The sum of pre-transplant AHA/ACCF risk factors (age >60 years, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, smoking, dialysis >1 year, left ventricular hypertrophy) was calculated. MPI scans were analyzed by a "blinded" reader. Patients were followed for a mean of 3.7 ± 2.3 years post-transplant for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. The sum of risk factors was associated with modest discriminatory capacity for obstructive angiographic CAD (area under the curve [AUC], 0.70; P = 0.004), 30-day post-operative MACE (AUC, 0.60; P = 0.036), and long-term MACE (AUC, 0.63; P < 0.001). A threshold of ≥3 risk factors was optimal for identifying patients at risk. MPI provided incremental predictive value for obstructive CAD (P = 0.02) and long-term MACE (P = 0.04) but not post-operative MACE (P = 0.56). MPI was best predictive of long-term MACE in intermediate risk (3-4 risk factors) patients.

conclusionsAsymptomatic kidney transplant candidates with ≥3 AHA/ACCF risk factors are at increased cardiac risk, and should be considered for noninvasive CAD surveillance. Intermediate risk patients (3-4 factors) benefit the most from pre-transplant MPI to define long-term MACE risk.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansKidney TransplantationMyocardial Perfusion ImagingRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorskidney transplantMyocardial perfusion imagingoutcomeperioperativerenal transplant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.