Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484945›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2017

The De Ritis (aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase) ratio as a predictor of oncological outcomes in patients after surgery for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Yang Hyun Cho, Jun Eul Hwang, Ho Seok Chung, Myung Soo Kim, Eu Chang Hwang, Seung Il Jung, Taek Won Kang, Dong Deuk Kwon, Seock Hwan Choi, Hyun Tae Kim and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Yang Hyun ChoDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebongro, Donggu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea.
Jun Eul HwangDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Ho Seok ChungDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebongro, Donggu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea.
Myung Soo KimDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebongro, Donggu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea.
Eu Chang HwangDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebongro, Donggu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea. urohwang@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2031-124X
Seung Il JungDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebongro, Donggu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea.
Taek Won KangDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebongro, Donggu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea.
Dong Deuk KwonDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebongro, Donggu, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea.
Seock Hwan ChoiDepartment of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Hyun Tae KimDepartment of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Tae-Hwan KimDepartment of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Tae Gyun KwonDepartment of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Joon Hwa NohDepartment of Urology, Kwangju Christian Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Myung Ki KimDepartment of Urology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.
Chul-Sung KimDepartment of Urology, Chosun University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Sung Gu KangDepartment of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seok Ho KangDepartment of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jun CheonDepartment of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chan Ho LeeDepartment of Urology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Ja Yoon KuDepartment of Urology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Hong Koo HaDepartment of Urology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Bum Sik TaeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chang Wook JeongDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ja Hyeon KuDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cheol KwakDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyeon Hoe KimDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecently, several studies have shown that the De Ritis ratio (aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase) can be a useful prognostic biomarker for certain types of malignant tumors. However, the prognostic value of the De Ritis ratio in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma remains largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the De Ritis ratio in patients who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

methodsIn total, 1049 patients who underwent RNU at eight institutions from 2004 to 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. The De Ritis ratio and conventional clinicopathological parameters were analyzed. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was carried out using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. De Ritis ratio cutoff values were derived from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

resultsROC analysis showed the cutoff De Ritis ratio for overall death to be 1.6 (p = 0.002). The cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter for patients with a high De Ritis ratio (>1.6). Multivariate analysis revealed an independent relationship between an increased De Ritis ratio (>1.6) and shorter CSS (hazard ratio, HR 2.49, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.70-3.64; p = 0.001) and OS (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.34-2.52; p = 0.001).

conclusionThe De Ritis ratio can be a significant predictor of oncological outcomes in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after surgery.

Indexed as

AgedAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Transitional CellDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsKidney PelvisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorAlanine transaminaseAspartate aminotransferasePrognosisSurvivalTransitional cell carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.