Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484882›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

The effectiveness and safety of same-day versus next-day administration of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a systematic review.

Gary H Lyman, Kim Allcott, Jacob Garcia, Scott Stryker, Yanli Li, Maureen T Reiner, Derek Weycker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05949333 (Reducing Neutropenia Incidence by Changing the Date of Eflapegrastim Administration in Breast Cancer Patients Who Have Experienced Neutropenia After Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05949333 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Neutropenia Incidence by Changing the Date of Eflapegrastim Administration in Breast Cancer Patients Who Have Experienced Neutropenia After Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorEunseong Medical Foundation Good GANG-AN HOSPITALRan2023 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsBreast NeoplasmsArmsEflapegrastim
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Current state and future opportunities in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gary H LymanFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. glyman@fredhutch.org.
Kim AllcottOxford PharmaGenesis Ltd., Oxford, UK.
Jacob GarciaAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Scott StrykerAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Yanli LiAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Maureen T ReinerAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Derek WeyckerPolicy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Brookline, MA, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USOxford Instruments (United Kingdom) · GBPolicy Analysis (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGranulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) are commonly used in clinical practice to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN). US and EU prescribing information and treatment guidelines from the NCCN, ASCO, and EORTC specify that pegfilgrastim, a long-acting (LA) G-CSF, should be administered at least 24 h after myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Nevertheless, many patients receive LA G-CSFs on the same day as chemotherapy. This systematic literature review evaluated the relative merits of same-day versus next-day dosing of LA G-CSFs.

methodsA broad Ovid MEDLINE® and Embase® literature search was conducted that examined all publications indexed before May 9, 2016 that compared same-day versus next-day LA G-CSF administration. A congress abstract literature search included congresses from January 1, 2011 to April 6, 2016. The parameters for this review were prospectively delineated in a research protocol and adhered to the PRISMA Guidelines.

resultsThe first part of the systematic literature search identified 1736 publications. After elimination of duplicates, title/abstract screening was conducted on 1440 records, and full text review was conducted on 449 publications. Eleven publications met all criteria and are included in this systematic review; of these, four included data from randomized or single arm prospective studies, and seven were retrospective studies. In most studies included in this review and across a variety of tumor types, administration of pegfilgrastim at least 24 h after myelosuppressive chemotherapy resulted in improved patient outcomes.

conclusionsData from multiple publications support administration of pegfilgrastim at least 1 day after chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeutropeniaProspective StudiesGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorFilgrastimGranulocyte colony-stimulating factorNeutropeniaPegfilgrastim

Identifiers

PMID28484882
OpenAlexW2610397084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.