Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484877›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2017

Combined application of diclofenac and celecoxib with an opioid yields superior efficacy in metastatic bone cancer pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Zunyong Liu, Yan Xu, Zhong-Liang Liu, Yi-Zhou Tian, Xiao-Heng Shen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The role of combined adjuvant therapeutic drugs in modulating opioid dosage and pain status in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Celecoxib in oncology: targeting the COX-2/PGEFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Management of cancer pain due to bone metastasis.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The Challenges of Managing Bone Pain in Cancer.The Ulster medical journal · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zunyong LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Traditional Medicine Hospital of Zhoushan City, Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China.
Yan XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Traditional Medicine Hospital of Zhoushan City, Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China.
Zhong-Liang LiuDepartment of Oncology, Traditional Medicine Hospital of Zhoushan City, Xinqiao Raod 355, Zhoushan, 31600, Zhejiang, China. penghao_h@sina.com.
Yi-Zhou TianDepartment of Oncology, Traditional Medicine Hospital of Zhoushan City, Xinqiao Raod 355, Zhoushan, 31600, Zhejiang, China.
Xiao-Heng ShenDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhoushan Hospital · CNRuijin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic bone cancer pain is one of the most common clinical cancer pains and is caused by many factors. This study was conducted to explore the clinical efficacy of using two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) along with an opioid in treating metastatic bone cancer pain. MATERIAL AND

methodA total of 342 patients with a pain score of 7-10 on the visual analog scale (VAS) were recruited for 4 weeks of treatment and randomly assigned to three different groups-one group received two NSAIDs (diclofenac and celecoxib), one group received diclofenac, and one group received celecoxib. All patients received morphine sulfate 10 mg/12 h with a reduction of 50% or addition of 25% each time until the VAS score was <5. The VAS score, remission rate (RR), breakthrough pain (BTP), morphine sulfate dose and side-effects among the three groups were compared.

resultsAfter 4 weeks of treatment, we found that using two NSAIDs along with an opioid could yield a significantly lower VAS score (p = 0.006), higher RR (p = 0.0002) and fewer incidences of BTP (p = 0.011), compared to the use of only one NSAID. Furthermore, using two NSAIDS could significantly decrease the consumption of morphine sulfate compared to using each NSAID in isolation (p = 0.0031 in week 1; p = 0.020 in week 2; p = 0.0012 in week 4). Additionally, using two NSAIDs could produce fewer incidences of dizziness (p = 0.002), constipation (p < 0.0001) and drowsiness (p < 0.0001).

conclusionAlthough limited by the relatively small samples, these results indicate that using two NSAIDs along with an opioid in treating metastatic bone cancer pain was more effective and acceptable, which is worthy of further clinical application.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBone NeoplasmsCancer PainCelecoxibDiclofenacFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorphinePain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCelecoxibDiclofenacMorphineCelecoxibDiclofenacMetastatic bone cancer painOpioid

Identifiers

PMID28484877
OpenAlexW2612651962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.