Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2017
Combined application of diclofenac and celecoxib with an opioid yields superior efficacy in metastatic bone cancer pain: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The role of combined adjuvant therapeutic drugs in modulating opioid dosage and pain status in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Non-Radiation Based Early Pain Relief Treatment Options for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Cancer Induced Bone Pain: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and pain in cancer patients: a systematic review and reappraisal of the evidence.British journal of anaesthesia · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy of celecoxib as preemptive analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial.Surgery today · 2021Trial
- Significance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer.Heliyon · 2025Review
- Celecoxib in oncology: targeting the COX-2/PGEFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Article
- Opioid and Non-Opioid Pharmacotherapy Use for Pain Management Among Privately Insured Pediatric Patients With Cancer in the United States.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Management of cancer pain due to bone metastasis.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2023Review
- Clinical Efficacy of Controlled-Release Morphine Tablets Combined with Celecoxib in Pain Management and the Effects on WNK1 Expression.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2021Article
- The Challenges of Managing Bone Pain in Cancer.The Ulster medical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic bone cancer pain is one of the most common clinical cancer pains and is caused by many factors. This study was conducted to explore the clinical efficacy of using two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) along with an opioid in treating metastatic bone cancer pain. MATERIAL AND
methodA total of 342 patients with a pain score of 7-10 on the visual analog scale (VAS) were recruited for 4 weeks of treatment and randomly assigned to three different groups-one group received two NSAIDs (diclofenac and celecoxib), one group received diclofenac, and one group received celecoxib. All patients received morphine sulfate 10 mg/12 h with a reduction of 50% or addition of 25% each time until the VAS score was <5. The VAS score, remission rate (RR), breakthrough pain (BTP), morphine sulfate dose and side-effects among the three groups were compared.
resultsAfter 4 weeks of treatment, we found that using two NSAIDs along with an opioid could yield a significantly lower VAS score (p = 0.006), higher RR (p = 0.0002) and fewer incidences of BTP (p = 0.011), compared to the use of only one NSAID. Furthermore, using two NSAIDS could significantly decrease the consumption of morphine sulfate compared to using each NSAID in isolation (p = 0.0031 in week 1; p = 0.020 in week 2; p = 0.0012 in week 4). Additionally, using two NSAIDs could produce fewer incidences of dizziness (p = 0.002), constipation (p < 0.0001) and drowsiness (p < 0.0001).
conclusionAlthough limited by the relatively small samples, these results indicate that using two NSAIDs along with an opioid in treating metastatic bone cancer pain was more effective and acceptable, which is worthy of further clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.